SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (8791)12/12/1998 11:23:00 AM
From: J.E.Currie  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14226
 
Off Topic

THE WAR HITS HOME"
Newsweek Magazine
December 14, 1998
By Michael Hirsch

**********************************************************

( CNNA,12-10 ) --"We are in a global financial crisis," suddenly announced the
mainstream media outlets, in September of 1998.
That stunning announcement has since been given short shrift by major news outlets,
considering what a huge impact such a crisis is bound to have.
And here at home, during this crucial season for retailers, we are lullabied by repeated
mantra: "The economy is good."

With 1998 having seen the most massive corporate layoffs of employees since 1993,
now surpassing the 500,000 mark and sure to grow during the Holiday season, what
kind of "good economy" is that?
With 1998 having seen 7 of the top 8 corporate mergers of all time, with a consequent
accumulation of Capital into fewer hands, just who is the economy "good" for?
Beneath the surface, there are serious economic rumblings.
Financial titans are in a desperate end-game race: who will win, and exclusively
control the wealth of the world?
The two most obvious financial titans are the House of Rockefeller and the House of
Rothschild.
In a previous press release by the news service, we speculated that we are now
witnessing an eruption in the ongoing Rockefeller vs. Rothschild war.
THE EUREKA DOCUMENT which thrust this awareness into many minds was an
article in the current Newsweek magazine: "The War Hits Home" by Michael Hirsch;
December 14, 1998.
That article leaked to a relatively limited audience, the name of ROCKEFELLER as
having been a World War II collaborator with the Nazis.
The name of Rockefeller, besides being explicitly mention in Mr. Hirsh's story is also
interwoven throuth the piece.
It lurks beneath the surface in several paragraphs.
For example: Mr Hirsh concludes his article by mentioning a connection between John
Foster Dulles, the Sullivan & Cromwell law firm, and the Nazis.
Not explicitly stated, but readable "between the lines," is the connection between
Dulles, Sullivan & Cromwell, and the Rockefeller Foundation.
In his book, "David: Report on a Rockefeller" ( New York: Lyle Stuart, Inc., 1971 )
author William Hoffman spells it out: John Foster Dulles was a former head of the
Rockefeller Foundation, and was associated with the law firm of Sullivan & Cromwell,
a leading legal agent for all of the Rockefellers."
The newsweek article, by Mr. Hirsh, is a not-so-subtle blast against the name of
Rockefeller. "Get Rockefeller" is written all over it.
And who exactly would want to "get Rockefeller"?
Does the name ROCHSCHILD ring a bell?
An article in the current TIME magazine ( Decembeer 14, 1998 ) gives its own slant
on the unfolding story of corporate connections with Nazi Germany.
That article takes the position that lawsuits seeking reparations for Jewish survivors of
the Holocaust somehow demean the sufferings of World War II-era victims, by
tainting that memory with lucre.
A counter-blast by the Rockefellers? In the memory of millions of State-murdered
Jews, let's forget about it?
This is a developing story.

PUZZLE PIECE #1: oN jULY 8, 1996, Amschel Rothschild, heir to the Rothschild
banking fortune was found dead, in Paris. His death was officially called a suicide, but
it is apparent that he was in fact murdered.
Amschel Rothschild was found to have been strangled with the cord of his bathrobe,
with the other end attached to a towel rack.
But one of the French detectives at the scene gave a pull on the towel rack, and the
towel rack came right off the wall.
In an article Aug. 5, 1996, which states definitely that Amschel Rothschild "was
murdered", according to well-placed European sources."

PUZZLE PIECE #2: Shortly after the murder of Amschel Rothschild, on July 17,
1996, TWA Flight 800 was shot down near Long Island Owning a controlling interest
in TWA Airlines has been Chase Manhattan Bank, the Rockefeller Bank.
Did the Rockefellers still control TWA in 1996, when Flight 800 may have been,
according to several reports, carrying billions of dollars of phony "bearer bonds"?
Reportedly, there were no duplicates for these bonds about to come due. Banks
basing their lending practices on fractional reserve guidelines, 10% assets per 90%
loans, and having these counterfeit bearer bonds as their supposed Capital base,would
have been in big trouble when the bonds matured.
Whose banks were saved by the crash of TWA 800? Some Rothschild banks,
perhaps?

PUZZLE PIECE #3: Collapsing Oil Prices. Kofi Annan, Secretary General of the
United Nations, has several times intervened to help avert imminent military attacks on
Iraq.
Primary banker to the U.N. has been the Chase Manhattan Bank, "a Rockefeller
bastion" according to the Hirsch Newsweek article.
In his book William Hoffman states that Chase Manhattan "employs a full-time envoy
to the United Nations, for whom the Chase serves as banker . ."

And the very land, in New York on which sits the U.N. building, was donated by the
Rockefellers.
Recently, a huge mega-merger, has occurred between Exxon and Mobil, both of
themRockefeller entities.
There is a "glut" of oil on the world market, and part of that "glut" is coming from Iraq.

Bombing Iraq would decrease the amount of oil available on the world market, and
send oil prices higher.
But Rockefeller interests, for now, do not seem to mind the low oil prices, since their
agent, Kofi Annan, has been acting to prevent a military attack on Iraq.
However, some major oil corporations, such as British Petroleum ( BP ) , might very
much want oil prices to rise.
Not known at this point is what major oil corporations, if any, are controlled by
Rothschild banking interests.
Known, however, is that Bill Clinton has defied the "special relationship" between
Britain and the U.S., for example by inviting Gerry Adams, linked to the Irish
Republican Army, to the White House.
Historically intertwined with Great Britain has been the House of Rothschild -- for
example, the Rothschilds facilitated the acquisition of the Suez Canal, a vital British
interest, by loaning the Crown 4 million pounds sterling in 1875.

PUZZLE PIECE #4: U.S. President Bill Clinton is currently in hot water, facing
impeachment.
But who controls Clinton, Rothschilds or Rockefellers?
A good guess is that Bill Clinton is a Rockefeller stooge.
In his book, "Clinton Confidential," George Carpozi, Jr. writes that the ultra-secret
Bilderberg Group, whose membership prominently includes the name of David
Rockefeller, "annointed" -- and programmed -- William Jefereson Blythe Clinton IV to
be 42nd president of the United States."
Many have torn their hair, over the years, wondering how it is that Bill Clinton can
have escaped srious scrutiny by the corporate news outlets.
Rockefeller protection may be the answer.
But the now-erupting Rockefeller/Rothschild feud, sparked by the acknowledged
global financial crisis, seems to have helped fan the flames under William Jefferson
Clinton.

Newsweek and TIME picked an opportune time to delve into the
Rothschild/Rockefeller feud that goes back many, many years. But what does this all
mean for the United States of America?