SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rudedog who wrote (84956)12/11/1998 5:18:00 PM
From: John Koligman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Rudedog - I have a question on your comments in regard to the amount of engineering that would need to be done for a manufacturer to use another MPU (AMD in this case). Is the motherboard the problem? I would think that AMD would be more than happy to make a great deal with another major boxmaker, supplying them with boths chips and boards (boards possibly thru a 3rd party). Or is it mostly testing the systems with the new chip/board and all components for 'gotchas'?

Thanks,
John



To: rudedog who wrote (84956)12/11/1998 5:29:00 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Which (threat) would Intel regard as more credible
I think were Dell to use another vendor's chipset would greatly add legitimacy to the other vendor. This is a situation Intel is anxious to avoid. I don't think Dell wants to complicate it's supply chain with multiple CPU vendors and I think Intel will make sure they are not forced to do so.

Compaq shifting between vendors does not have much effect outside of their own customer base.

TP