SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas Sprague who wrote (19585)12/11/1998 5:23:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
More 3G>

From the December 14, 1998 issue of Wireless Week

3G Players Question ITU's Dispensability

By Caron Carlson

WASHINGTON--The day after the International Telecommunication Union delivered an ultimatum to the clashing intellectual
property right claimants in the third-generation standards debate, both camps issued veiled hints that they may not need the ITU
after all.

In a press release Dec. 8, Ericsson Inc. offered a standards harmonization proposal and simultaneously heaped praises on the
3G Partnership Project, a group composed of standards bodies from Europe, Japan, Korea and the United States that support
wideband code division multiple access technology. While some in the industry view this and other regional projects as
duplicating the ITU's decade-long efforts, others question whether the partnerships may become the ultimate arena for
completing work on next-generation wireless standards.

Proponents of cdma2000 rejected Ericsson's harmonization proposal and simultaneously downplayed the ITU's importance in
the deployment of their 3G systems. "The fact that the ITU said it will go forward with standardizing [time division multiple
access] is probably not really much of an issue for us," said Perry LaForge, executive director for the CDMA Development
Group. "Most of the world only cares about CDMA for 3G ... We'll proceed forward on CDMA" in the Telecommunications
Industry Association, the U.S. standards body backing cdma2000. "The IPR would be granted under the terms of the TIA."

LaForge said Ericsson's harmonization proposal, which centers on reducing the so-called chip rate for W-CDMA from 4.096
to 3.84 megabits per second, represents continued unwillingness to offer a feasible compromise for cdma2000 proponents.
"Their compromise proposal is just another iteration of what they've done all along," LaForge said. "They're trying to do things
to be purposefully different. To do something like this and then call it a compromise is basically an insult." CDG will accept no
chip rate other than cdma2000's 3.68 Mbps rate, he said.

Ericsson's reduced chip rate proposal was intended as an olive branch, and any further reduction would result in unacceptable
performance loss, according to John Giere, vice president for public affairs. "The 3.84 has always lingered in discussions. Now
it's time we try to make it happen," Giere said. "What [the other camp is] saying is: Do it our way or no way ... In any case, the
regional standardization process is still going forward." Giere said operators around the world, including some cdmaOne
carriers, have expressed interest in the 3.84 chip rate.

For TDMA proponents, the ITU ultimatum to Ericsson and Qualcomm Inc. raised concern that the 3G process will drag on
past its schedule if the IPR deadline is extended. "The IPR argument has already gone on six months too long," said Paul
Meche, chairman of the Universal Wireless Communications Consortium. "As a result, media attention, government interaction
and all the rest have become an embarrassment to the industry and also a waste of a lot of resources. Those who complied
[with ITU rules] in good faith and on schedule are now being held up."




To: Thomas Sprague who wrote (19585)12/11/1998 5:25:00 PM
From: Ruffian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
ITU>3G>
From the December 14, 1998 issue of Wireless Week

ITU Issues Warning

Vendors Must Resolve IPR Issues

By Daniel Pruzin

GENEVA--The International Telecommunication Union last week warned Ericsson Inc. and Qualcomm Inc. to resolve their
differences over intellectual property claims on radio transmission technologies--or risk seeing the two standards disqualified for
consideration as a global third-generation standard.

The ITU is now trying to draw up an "umbrella standard" for 3G systems that would allow for global mobile roaming and
worldwide interoperability between landline and wireless networks. ITU officials have said the final choice is expected to
include several compatible standards because no single technology will be the best under all operating environments.

Sixteen terrestrial radio and satellite standards have been submitted to the ITU by various industry groups worldwide as
possible third-generation norms. To be considered, however, all intellectual property rights claims on submissions must either
be waived or licensed on a fair and nondiscriminatory basis.

Both Stockholm, Sweden-based Ericsson and Qualcomm Inc. of San Diego submitted statements to the ITU last fall claiming
patents or pending patents on technologies used in both wideband code division multiple access and cdma2000. But
Qualcomm surprised the industry by announcing that it was unwilling to either waive or license its intellectual property rights on
W-CDMA unless three demands were met regarding the selection of the 3G standard.

Qualcomm's demands were that a single, converged worldwide CDMA standard should be selected as the new 3G standard;
that the new standard must be backward-compatible with existing second-generation standards; and that disputes on
technological points "should be resolved by selecting the proposal that either is demonstrably superior ... [or] most compatible
with existing technologies."

Ericsson earlier told the ITU that it was willing to license its patents on both W-CDMA and cdma2000 but only on the basis of
reciprocity. "As long as Qualcomm doesn't offer IP rights, we won't offer ours," said Ericsson Vice President Ake Persson.

The Qualcomm demands reflect fears among the U.S. industry that the European Union is trying to impose the UMTS
terrestrial radio access standard as both a regional and global norm to protect its domestic manufacturers. UTRA, developed
by Ericsson based on W-CDMA technology, was adopted by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute as the
successor to global system for mobile communications.

The day after ITU's comments, Ericsson announced its willingness to compromise on the development of 3G by lowering its
standard's chip rate from 4.096 megabits per second to 3.84 Mbps to ensure compatibility with other new and existing norms
(see accompanying story on Page 1).

UTRA opponents accused ETSI at a congressional hearing last July of adopting the standard based on political rather than
technical considerations and of creating a technical barrier to trade by deliberately making UTRA incompatible with most
existing standards. U.S. Trade Representative Charlene Barshefsky last October accused the EU of trying to shut U.S. mobile
firms out of the market by adopting an exclusionary standard that would make it prohibitively expensive for companies using
other standards to sell and operate their products in Europe.

The ITU wants to make a decision on the 3G "umbrella standard" by March. If the IPR stalemate is not resolved by the end of
the year, the organization warned, it may be obliged to reject a half-dozen CDMA-based submissions, including cdma2000
and UTRA as well as proposals from the U.S.-based Telecommunications Industry Association's T1P1 Group for W-CDMA
North America, Japan's Association of Radio Industries and Businesses for W-CDMA and South Korea's
Telecommunications Technology Association for Global CDMA II.

"The ITU is concerned that a 'virtual holy war' [between rival firms] can well mark the end of a dream: the dream for
consumers to have truly 'anywhere, anytime communication across networks, across frontiers, across technologies for personal
access to information age services,' the organization said in its Dec. 7 statement.



To: Thomas Sprague who wrote (19585)12/11/1998 9:01:00 PM
From: Sawtooth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
<<Six months ago the Q would have been dwn 6$ on yesterdays news. (8$)?>>

I'll second that, Thomas. I've also been noting that the Q has become significantly more resistant to events or news that previously would have pulled the rug out from under the price. I'll take it as a good sign.

Regards.