To: Thomas Sprague who wrote (19585 ) 12/11/1998 5:23:00 PM From: Ruffian Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
More 3G> From the December 14, 1998 issue of Wireless Week 3G Players Question ITU's Dispensability By Caron Carlson WASHINGTON--The day after the International Telecommunication Union delivered an ultimatum to the clashing intellectual property right claimants in the third-generation standards debate, both camps issued veiled hints that they may not need the ITU after all. In a press release Dec. 8, Ericsson Inc. offered a standards harmonization proposal and simultaneously heaped praises on the 3G Partnership Project, a group composed of standards bodies from Europe, Japan, Korea and the United States that support wideband code division multiple access technology. While some in the industry view this and other regional projects as duplicating the ITU's decade-long efforts, others question whether the partnerships may become the ultimate arena for completing work on next-generation wireless standards. Proponents of cdma2000 rejected Ericsson's harmonization proposal and simultaneously downplayed the ITU's importance in the deployment of their 3G systems. "The fact that the ITU said it will go forward with standardizing [time division multiple access] is probably not really much of an issue for us," said Perry LaForge, executive director for the CDMA Development Group. "Most of the world only cares about CDMA for 3G ... We'll proceed forward on CDMA" in the Telecommunications Industry Association, the U.S. standards body backing cdma2000. "The IPR would be granted under the terms of the TIA." LaForge said Ericsson's harmonization proposal, which centers on reducing the so-called chip rate for W-CDMA from 4.096 to 3.84 megabits per second, represents continued unwillingness to offer a feasible compromise for cdma2000 proponents. "Their compromise proposal is just another iteration of what they've done all along," LaForge said. "They're trying to do things to be purposefully different. To do something like this and then call it a compromise is basically an insult." CDG will accept no chip rate other than cdma2000's 3.68 Mbps rate, he said. Ericsson's reduced chip rate proposal was intended as an olive branch, and any further reduction would result in unacceptable performance loss, according to John Giere, vice president for public affairs. "The 3.84 has always lingered in discussions. Now it's time we try to make it happen," Giere said. "What [the other camp is] saying is: Do it our way or no way ... In any case, the regional standardization process is still going forward." Giere said operators around the world, including some cdmaOne carriers, have expressed interest in the 3.84 chip rate. For TDMA proponents, the ITU ultimatum to Ericsson and Qualcomm Inc. raised concern that the 3G process will drag on past its schedule if the IPR deadline is extended. "The IPR argument has already gone on six months too long," said Paul Meche, chairman of the Universal Wireless Communications Consortium. "As a result, media attention, government interaction and all the rest have become an embarrassment to the industry and also a waste of a lot of resources. Those who complied [with ITU rules] in good faith and on schedule are now being held up."