Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (18672)	12/14/1998 10:18:00 AM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

P.S. Nope, you are wrong. We were discussing Barr advocating impeachment (as opposed to an impeachment inquiry in the article you cite over an entirely different matter) as it relates to the current set of charges against Clinton. Lying under oath, obstruction of justice, perjury and abuse of power. In that context, I stated that I believed that Barr had very early on (as had others, including Dem. McHale) had suggested that Clinton resign based on what was currently known at the time. It was his opinion and belief that in spite of Clinton's public statement to the contrary, that the POTUS had a sexual relationship with a WH intern and that he lied about it. That was his opinion at the time and has most certainly been bore out by the facts, prescient,huh. bp PS: Sorry for the belated response, holiday season beckons......