SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Legal proceedings via SI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Estimated Prophet who wrote (4)12/12/1998 2:03:00 AM
From: Bill Ulrich  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 242
 
Thanks for the response, EP. You've persuaded me. If those chaps can use SI for shady tactics, no reason to keep it quiet here.

Tactics, I might add, that include:
1. announcing delistings of stocks that really aren't delisted&#151

2. announcing purchase orders that don't really exist&#151

3. re-writing court orders that don't go in their favour&#151

well then I guess there's nothing wrong with addressing it here, right where it happened.



To: Estimated Prophet who wrote (4)12/12/1998 2:06:00 PM
From: Cheeky Kid  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 242
 
If someone posts a joke on the Laughter Thread, and some reader laughs so hard he /she spills their hot coffee on them self, is the poster at risk of a law suit for posting that message?



To: Estimated Prophet who wrote (4)12/12/1998 2:11:00 PM
From: Lost in New York  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 242
 
re: From: +Charles L. Solomont, Esq., Bin

What's the "Bin" mean? Is he X-files A.I. executable that got loose <G> or is some legal type abbreviation?

Dave



To: Estimated Prophet who wrote (4)12/13/1998 3:41:00 PM
From: Nathan Hansen  Respond to of 242
 
"Ditto" to this post.

<<Three cheers for the lawyers who posted it and let's hope SI doesn't do anything to limit these types of messages from lawyers. It would be a tremendous assist to the already relatively sane and responsible atmosphere encouraging responsible posting on SI.>>

IMO, SI has a more respectful type of posting activity than any other board, and it would be nice to keep it that way.

Nathan



To: Estimated Prophet who wrote (4)12/13/1998 4:04:00 PM
From: Cheeky Kid  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 242
 
Question;

I haven't read those posts that got those guys in trouble, but what about all the bad things people are saying about your President on certian threads. Why can't Clinton sue them?