Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (18779)	12/12/1998 4:14:00 PM
From: jbe	Respond to of 67261

Thanks so much for the debate text links, Dan. I don't know how I missed them! (Cheapskate that I am, I too was using the web version, not the print version.) jbe

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (18779)	12/12/1998 5:13:00 PM
From: Dan B.	Respond to of 67261

I've read plenty you've had to say here. Try this on for size. I have great respect for anyone who cherishes the right to personal freedoms and personal sexual privacy. But in this long story, a woman who kept her mouth shut so long- was slandered by implication by a right wing magazine and the testimony of Policemen. The evidence implicating her existed because Clinton had asked to see State Employee Paula Jones in his office. He thus became, in a he said/she said situation, the ONLY one who could clear her name- the reporting magazine(American Spectator) couldn't possibly accomplish this. He refused- he never expected her to get a case in court. He CONTINUES to deny he even remembers her- which is just not plausible at this point in time. He knowingly and wrongly committed perjury over Lewinsky in order to damage the Jones suit. His desires have taken him now beyond the pale story of a family matter. It's perjury against the case of another citizen, and it's by god impeachable. So arrogant is he that he has probably said to himself long ago "I didn't get anything offa her so I'll be damned if I'm going to let THIS news item hurt MY reputation- I'll Deny it." Jones's prior history of public silence would indicate she may well have kept the details to herself if only he'd admitted calling her to his room- as soon as it came out- and stated simply that nothing happened between them. But on the assumtpion that America(and his wife) wouldn't be so NIAVE, he lied- and that lie brought us all the way to his enlisting of Monica Lewinsky to lie- and to lie about enlisting her to lie- oh geez it's endless....and all the way to today when he still denies these actions plain. All to protect himself from a situation where he didn't get any! GEEZ! What a putz. His willingness to withold the truth and allow Paula Jones to be damaged in the public eye, and the perjuring lengths his "shame" has taken him- is definitely an affront to women, the law, and all citizens. He should be REMOVED from office.