SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (29743)12/13/1998 12:04:00 AM
From: jach  Respond to of 164684
 
Message 6799158

part of the last segment from this article:

"Internet stocks were pushed higher in
early trading by online buying of individuals who are enamored of
all things related to the Internet. Amid publicity about first-
day gains of those stocks, they have not paid enough attention to
the companies' earnings prospects.

''That's a dangerous way to invest,'' said Cook."

===========================================

"The year of living dangerously
Short too low - covered too high, then
Buy too high - liquidate all at a dime"

===========================================



To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (29743)12/13/1998 1:17:00 AM
From: getgo234  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 164684
 
Glenn and others:
Interesting article in Sunday online edition of NYT titled The Glass is half empty. Within the article Ed Hyman notes the correlation between the CRB and operating earnings for the S + P 500. With the CRB down 17.5% in 1998 Ed expects corp earnings to be weak in 1999. New thought, within the same article a comment is made regarding the inability of companies to pass on price increases. IMO it seems that consumers in general have learned to take advantage of buying sales and not paying full price.
Yet many of the posters on this thread continue to reiterate that
convenience and not pricing is what will make AMZN a long term success. I would surmise that a small percentage of the population, upper middle class and above will always be content to go directly
go AMZN and pay a premium if necessary to do so. However, the vast
majority of people like myself will look for the best pricing be it online or at the local bookstore. Comments please. ps I stopped in
Borders tonight and it was very busy. Apparently not everyone is purchasing their books on the internet.



To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (29743)12/13/1998 4:04:00 AM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Glenn, day traders beware. Especially if your on margin.

By REBECCA BUCKMAN
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Continuing their crackdown on "day trading" firms, Massachusetts securities regulators have accused All-Tech Investment Group Inc., Montvale, N.J., of several securities violations, including unauthorized trading, commingling customer funds and forging signatures to open fake accounts.

In a lengthy administrative complaint filed Thursday, the Massachusetts Securities Division also alleged that the firm allowed unregistered individuals in the Watertown, Mass., office to act as investment advisers and more generally used "deceptive marketing" to convince potential customers they could make profits trading with the firm.

Regulators pointed to a message from All-Tech Chief Executive Officer Harvey Houtkin on the company's Web site: "Some people claim I have found the key to financial independence -- Electronic Day Trading."

Mr. Houtkin and All-Tech's chief lawyer, Linda Lerner, say they received only one written complaint about the Watertown office and are angry that Massachusetts regulators didn't work with the company to resolve the issues in the complaint before filing it. Mr. Houtkin called regulators' efforts a "witch hunt," noting that the state filed complaints against two other day-trading firms earlier this fall.

Referring to some firm customers, he added: "They lose some money, and some people are just crybabies."

Day-trading companies such as All-Tech, which Mr. Houtkin opened in 1988, typically offer office space and computer equipment to small investors who want to trade stocks full-time, usually by zooming in and out of positions and capturing tiny price differentials in stocks.

While the high-pressure trading style can pay big dividends for some savvy investors, state securities regulators have recently voiced concerns that too many wide-eyed novices are getting burned, often after ponying up big bucks for training courses run by day-trading firms. Mr. Houtkin's company offers one 30-day course that costs $5,000, although the training wasn't mentioned in Massachusetts' most recent complaint.

"If people want to day trade, they can day trade. If they want to play the lottery, they can play the lottery," said Matthew Nestor, chief of enforcement for the state's securities division, part of the Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth. "But in the securities industry, you've got to adequately disclose risk."

Mr. Houtkin says his company does tell new customers they can lose money trading and is "very careful" about predicting investor success. "We go out of our way to warn people," he said in an interview. "Our customers are very sophisticated, very knowledgeable. They know exactly what they're doing."

Mr. Nestor says the claims against All-Tech stem from an unannounced Nov. 13 visit to the firm's Watertown branch, as well as a follow-up investigation. The complaint alleges that the manager of the branch, Fred A. Zayas, fraudulently misused customer funds by moving money between accounts without investors' knowledge to cover "margin calls," ensuring that investors could keep making trades and racking up commissions for All-Tech.

Investors get a margin call, or a request to put up more money, when they have borrowed funds against the value of securities in their account and the value of those securities falls below a certain level. Mr. Zayas, who securities regulators say left All-Tech on Nov. 20, didn't return messages seeking comment. Mr. Houtkin and Ms. Lerner say he resigned.

The complaint, which names Mr. Houtkin, Mr. Zayas, All-Tech President Mark D. Shefts and two unregistered traders, also alleges that the unregistered traders managed other investors' money without being licensed as investment advisers, a practice considered a securities violation in some states. The two traders, with help from Mr. Zayas, also opened fake brokerage accounts, often with forged customer signatures, in a "systematic attempt" to keep investors' accounts open and active, Mr. Nestor says.

"We believe what we've alleged to be significant regulatory problems," Mr. Nestor said, noting that his division wants to revoke All-Tech's brokerage license and the licenses of Messrs. Houtkin, Zayas and Shefts.