Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DaveMG who wrote (19630)	12/13/1998 10:54:00 AM
From: Clarksterh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Dave - 'Multi-carrier' is a reference to how a current IS-95 system is upgraded to CDMA-2000 in a frequency planning sense: 1) If tomorrow CDMA-2000 were approved, but no new spectrum were allocated, the current PCS operator cannot just drop 9 (for example) contiguous IS-95 chip rates and move to three contiguous 3.6x chip rate systems. The current handset do not recognize 3.6x chip rates nor would they recognize all of the CDMA-2000 protocols - i.e. they are not forward compatible. 2) But this is not an insurmountable problem. By using a multiple of the same chip rate they can switch over gradually. Thus, initially the service providers would start handing out CDMA-2000 phones which would work even though there was no CDMA-2000 carrier. The CDMA-2000 phones would be backwards compatible with IS-95 and thus would work, although without any of the 3g capabilities. When there were enough CDMA-2000 phones in use, the service providers could designate that one of the IS-95 channels is now CDMA-2000, albeit without the full performance because the chip rate is too low. There is no need to find more spectrum since it uses exactly the same amount of spectrum as the carrier it replaced. 3) As more and more users migrate to CDMA-2000, from IS-95, the service provider can turn over other IS-95 carriers until eventually there are three contiguous CDMA-2000 narrow channels (each with their own carrier). The service provider can now merge all of these together into one carrier with a 3.6x chip rate because it is a multiple of the original IS-95 chip rate. This merging is very efficient since it uses exactly the same amount of spectrum, but now provides full 3g service. Clark PS I suspect that there is yet another benefit, besides ease-of-upgrade, of the 'multiple carriers' scenario. For narrowband communications (i.e. normal phones) the slower chip rate may actually be more efficient in some scenarios (such as rake receivers dealing with multipath). Thus, even after everything is CDMA-2000 there may still be cases where there are three CDMA-2000 narrowband channels instead of one 3.6x chip rate channel. Clark

To: DaveMG who wrote (19630)	12/15/1998 3:22:00 AM
From: freak.monster1	Respond to of 152472

>Could you please explain the meaning of multi carrier in this >context? Clark has already responded to this part. >Also, any take om what's happening with WAP? Not really up on WAP. It has been standardized in Japan. Unwired Planet (the developer of WAP) appears to be working closely with Symbian (developers of EPOC32, and patially owned by E & Nokia). QCOM is part of the WAP consortium (seem to also remember a press release about some QC ownership of UP, but I may be mistaken). But then, I suppose as part of WirelessKnowledge, perhaps Microsoft/QCOM may offer an alternative for end-to-end service provision interface. Don't know how it will play out. It is a layer above even the network interface (let alone air interface).