Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael F. Donadio who wrote (12585)	12/13/1998 1:38:00 PM
From: QwikSand	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 64865

Michael: I watched that keynote. Thanks for the link (http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/filters/comdex/radio/fall98/). It seems to answer the "computers without operating systems" question. I agree with you and highly recommend the first few minutes of Ellison's keynote for an articulate treatment of where the Sun/Oracle vision is going, including great hype for Java. He's a good spokesman. Ellison claims Oracle noted that on 50% of its installations, the server computer was running nothing but Oracle's DBMS. Oracle does its own disk management (apart from the driver), and doesn't need a GUI or other things an OS provides. Therefore, although Oracle was in a general-purpose OS environment, it wasn't using general-purpose OS services. This detracted from performance without a proportional gain in functionality. So Oracle simply created their own minimal "non-OS"...a real-time kernel with some disk and network drivers (no GUI...this is all on the HTML/XML/Java network computing model.) This isn't a computer without an operating system. Ellison indeed says that Oracle 8i runs "directly against the hardware", but this is marketing. It's a computer with a proprietary, dedicated operating system. (Ellison says the development of this dedicated "Oracle non-OS" was motivated by the lag in Windows 2000 technology. When Windows 2000 comes out at approximately the same time that Merced/McKinley, it will still be a 32-bit system, thereby masking off Merced's most important benefit to Oracle. While that's all true, this part was mostly gratuitous Microsoft-bashing because other 64-bit systems including Solaris will be out.) Note that when asked at the end, "Will Oracle8i run better on your non-OS then on Solaris?", Ellison replies, "Solaris is already a very fast 64-bit system. Probably not." If this is all they're announcing on Monday, i.e., a dedicated Oracle Internet Data Server consisting of a bundle of Oracle8i with Sun hardware but without Solaris, I'll be pretty disappointed. I don't know why McNealy would do something like that. I hope there's a lot more to it. Regards, --QwikSand