Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank Ellis Morris who wrote (21870)	12/14/1998 3:32:00 PM
From: Sonny McWilliams	Respond to of 27012

Frank. Maybe this will calm the markets. gg. Hillary - Angel of Mercy. Maybe future Ambassador to Palestine? dailynews.yahoo.com One talk on Wall Street is that the market is worried that the trio Clinton, Greenspan and Rubin may be torn apart. I would worry more about Rubin. And Brazil definitely is not helping today. Brazil is struggling again with their currency. Glad I am out their tel.stocks. May look interesting again soon. Naz is trying to catch up number wise with the DOW. On the downside. Monday's have not been outstanding for the markets lately and maybe Tuesday will finally be the start of the Xmas rally. I can think of a cpl of stocks I would love to get at these prices. LU is getting near an 88 entry point. I am tempted of getting more and Intel, wow. Sonny

To: Frank Ellis Morris who wrote (21870)	12/14/1998 4:02:00 PM
From: Sonny McWilliams	Respond to of 27012

Frank. Looks like the NAZ came to its senses. The DOW pulled strongly ahead on the downside. I don't think that is a plus though. gg. I did not mean that LU would come down to 88. Let's hope not. gg. Some money managers were looking at this number as a very good entry point. I certainly hope that they will be disappointed. This was a nutty 5 points down. Sonny

To: Frank Ellis Morris who wrote (21870)	12/19/1998 11:29:00 AM
From: Rob C.	Respond to of 27012

Sequen/INTC's latest benchmarks... Sequent has just posted new TPC-C results: 93,900.85 tmpC at $131.67 per tpmC. These results represent: >>>The second best TPC-C performance in the industry Company System Tpm-C $/Tpm-C Database 1) Compaq AlphaServer 8400 8Node 96CPU Cluster (c/s) 102541.85 $139.49 Oracle Oracle8 Enterprise Edition 8.0 2) Sequent NUMACenter 2000 93900.85 $131.67 Oracle Oracle8 Enterprise Edition 8.0.4 3) IBM RISC System/6000 SP Model 309 (c/s) 57053.8 $147.4 Oracle Oracle8 Enterprise Edition 8.0.4 4) Sun Enterprise 6500 Server 53049.97 $ 76 Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise 5) HP HP 9000 Model V2250 Enterprise Server (c/s) 52117.8 $ 81.17 Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise >>>The best and second best single-system (non-clustered) performance on Oracle, leading third-ranked HP by a margin of 130 percent: System TPM-C $/TPM-C Sequent NUMACenter 93,900.85 $131.67 Sequent NUMACenter 48,793.40 $127.53 HP V2200 40,794.36 $103.43 IBM RS6000 S70 34,139.63 $88.37 Fujitsu 7000 34,116.93 ¥57,883 >>>The best and second best price/performance on Oracle (including both clustered and non-clustered systems): No of System systems $/TpmC Tpm-C Sequent NUMACenter 1 $127.53 48,793.40 Sequent NUMACenter 1 $131.67 93,900.85 SUN E6000 2 $134.46 51,871.62 Compaq (DEC 8400) 8 $139.49 102,541.85 IBM RS6000 SP 309 12 $147.4 57,053.80 >>>The ONLY TPC-C results run in a mixed mode (UNIX & Windows NT) environment.