Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j g cordes who wrote (9323)	12/14/1998 10:36:00 AM
From: Liatris Spicata	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

<<DD.. are you such a whimp that cursing in the White House offends you? That's pretty weak, heck out in Montana we swear up and down the street and any woman worth her salt can kick butt if she has to. Come up with something really bad on the White House, like its actually a landing strip for alien invadersor that the Chinese control their brain waves with tofu!>> From this, I deduce you made light of concerns about haughty arrogant behavior that involved swearing at and shoving and swearing at low-level employees who could not effectively fight back. The very essence of "bitchiness". You seem breezily indifferent to Hillary's swearing and shoving of underlings, but affect offense at my use of the harsh but respectable word "bitch" in describing HRC. You are a hypocrite. <<The arrogance you accuse Hilary of is no different than your own. >> An idiotic, baseless, and unsubstantiated charge. I do not go swearing at people and shoving them, as the article about HRC claimed she does, behavior you apparently countenance. FTR, of the few people I've met from Montana, none of them-women included- engage in swearing and bullying. In fact, they tend to frown upon that kind of behavior. Perhaps only a few Montanans (including you?) engage in that kind of behavior. Oh well, I guess Montana has its human trash too. <<witch hunts which will not end with Clinton, but will dog both sides for years to come. >> What's the "witch hunt". Do you deny the serious charges leveled against Sleazebag Bill, or do you just think that's the way government should work? Far more damage to government will be done by letting presidents be beyond the reach of the law than will be done by using constitutional processes to oust a particular sitting president. You have no place in the table of serious discussion. Larry