Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Clarksterh who wrote (19696)	12/14/1998 11:05:00 AM
From: straight life	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Towards this goal there have been several independent studies which show CDMA-2000 has significantly more capacity that W-CDMA. Point me to even one such study which says the opposite. (You won't find it). This is the first I've heard of such studies (ok, I haven't read ALL the posts; who can?) but this is the sort of thing that Q! should be screaming about; sending copies of said reports to all the various technical publications that comment on 3G etc.

To: Clarksterh who wrote (19696)	12/14/1998 4:38:00 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Respond to of 152472

Good posts Clark. Thanks for the good explanations. Between all these ITU, SETI and other standards bodies, there are a LOT of hangers on. The most important issue for them is to keep the meetings coming. They need lots of negotiations. Lots of jamborees, minutes, folders full of 'delete obscure and arcane wording in clause 14a and replace with more obscure and prolix wording', votes on each of the 314 changes and nonsense from dawn to dusk. Then dinner, hotels, drinks, puffery and big noting to round it all off. Meanwhile, Limtex will be preparing a Welcome Home Q! party! quote.yahoo.com The Natural Home in the 40s! What a curse. Nevertheless, I'm with Jon and John Scurci. To be out of Q! at such a time seems crazy. Why spend the time figuring out what it's worth if we don't back our ideas with our money? Just because others sell their shares at what we think is a low price, doesn't mean we should agree. Rajala and many others are 'waiting and seeing' on the outcome of 3G, the Texas lawsuit outcome and the 1Q report on pre Xmas sales. If things look good, it will be easy to miss the bargains. Who will sell at low prices then? Mqurice PS: I see DaveMG has started the Welcome Home party without Limtex. Re Tero's comments, here's the url: debry.com He might get jumpy about ignoring copyright - he wants clicks on debry! He wants a Teroist Global Brand - can't have it diluted by SI Q! crowd. Though I heard Nokia and others think IP should be given away so we are all on a level playing field, with equal market access. We should let the market decide. How does it feel Tero? Still think Q! shouldn't set their own extorquerationate price?