Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: William JH who wrote (24276)	12/14/1998 9:31:00 PM
From: IngotWeTrust	Respond to of 116986

My personal experience has shown CNBC of OLD to be of considerable "investment" advantage, in answer to your inquiry. Made specific money off of Michael Metz, Louis Yamana, Eugene Peroni, even ole dufus from Unterberg Harris, Brian what-zis-name. Then there were the good ole days of making money off of Murphy's chart explanations, and even enjoyed shorting ole Dan O the Dorf O's pics and pans... Mostly short-term money, frankly. First got started on the 'street side' by keeping tick charts in the old days on the XOI and buying puts and calls when tick and trin went to extremes...that was fun...pre-computers doncha know. Pretty watered down nowadays and CNBC doesn't stand for much o'anything since they canned Murphy, put in Kathleen Hays as a lousy substitute for old Ed the bond man... Then there is ole Pis-ant-i doing his real-estate twist on stocks and bonds, trying to out blumberg, Roy, who was pretty darn priceless. Why can't they keep the gooders? Doesn't GE have enuf money to pay fer quality instead of just slotholders??