SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J. P. who wrote (85206)12/14/1998 12:43:00 PM
From: John Chen  Respond to of 176387
 
J.P,re:"WHAT...lie". Hmm, let's define 'LIE' first.

Let's not impeach Clinton because (..., just fill in). Let's have
the president election day named as Clinton/Lewisky day to remind
us that something do matters sometime.

Of course, $$$$ always matters.

Well, whatelse can one say and do, the DAMAGE is DONE. On 2nd thought,
let's have a 'CORRECTION', using wallstreet's term instead of
IMPEACH. Send Clinton to MiddleEast/Africa/anywhere as an ambassador,
give Clinton a nobel prize of peace or any honor he is working on.

Yeah, this is a farce. Now see who has better 'SPIN/MOUTH', or we
used to say 'propagado machine' (the communism).



To: J. P. who wrote (85206)12/14/1998 2:25:00 PM
From: Annette  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
His sexual relations with different women. "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Monica Lewinsky..."
He had sex with lips, right?
If he is going to twist the story to fit his needs, would we trust him with national matters?
Ok, if you want me to say he didn't lie? Maybe he didn't if most men view blow jobs as not having sexual relations. I guess he is just guilty of getting caught.
IMHO...end of thread.
Annette


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News