SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Duke who wrote (9343)12/14/1998 2:00:00 PM
From: gerard mangiardi  Respond to of 13994
 
If Reagan said he couldn't remember people would have believed him not due to his honesty but due to his feeble mind.



To: Duke who wrote (9343)12/14/1998 2:14:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
Treason was never an issue. At worst Reagan ignored an attempt by Congress to politicize and criminalize the executive's prerogative in foreign policy. He may have broken a law, the Boland Amendment in particular. For this if there was sufficient evidence he should have been prosecuted. Walsh chose not to prosecute. End of story. The others got off mainly because in Congress' zeal to hang Reagan, arguably the most successful and well liked President in the modern post war era, they forgot about the rule against self-incrimination. JLA



To: Duke who wrote (9343)12/14/1998 5:18:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 13994
 
>>I'm not sure which is worse -- agreeing to a treasonable act in one's administration, or not knowing enough about what is going on in the White House that one is responsible for.

Doesn't matter, since Clinton has done both. We can credit Clinton and his sale of missile technology for $$$ for the spread of nuclear terror.