Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (19330)	12/14/1998 3:07:00 PM
From: Yoav Chudnoff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

If you think that's silly, then why have the communist right been trying to nail Clinton for the past 4 years???? Why has the communist right been so eager to eliminate the President. all is fine not to like someone for whatevere the reason is . . . but to continue a war for the sole purpose to eliminate someone you disdain is utter BS. People are tolerant and understanding by nature, but when you begin a treasonous war against the President and Vice President of the United States and anyone who associiates with them just to have a notch next to your name and staking the claim "I got rid of the President" and tout it like a prarie chicken in heat - then it has become obvious that there is a mad man loose somewhere and the new age of the New Nazi Party is upon us.

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (19330)	12/14/1998 3:12:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Sure, bp. How long did the Watergate coverup go on? How long did the Iran-contra coverup go on? The second one never ended, to my knowledge. Of course, those were totally different, they involved affairs of state. Much less important than BJs. As for cooperation with the IC, Iran-contra surely set high standards for that one, too. But Lawrence Walsh couldn't possibly match the high ethical standards of Starr, could he? I find it the great respect and deference being shown toward the civil litigation arena on this one highly amusing. I also find it highly amusing to hear the public professions of the House leadership that members should "vote their conscience", which I'm sure is exactly what ex-exterminator DeLay is telling them in private, also. The "big tent" Republicans would never think of reprisals against those who go against the leadership, would they?