Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (16961)	12/14/1998 4:14:00 PM
From: Terry T.	Respond to of 18444

PT, I agree conditionally, if ESVS were to come through with the promised funding (this was purportedly the catalyst for the March 9 deal in the first place). But, to play that veritable devil's advocate, who is to say that the funding would not have been garnered by the same controlling shareholder and management on behalf of ZULU, if ESVS were not in the picture?

To: PartyTime who wrote (16961)	12/14/1998 4:15:00 PM
From: BlueFox	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

our own sense of objective questioning You have a vested interest in the stock price rising, so questioning and information searches will naturally be done to validate this. That's not objective. If anything, those who have nothing to gain by the stock moving in either direction are more objective - they aren't looking for an answer that will benefit them, since all answers don't affect them either way. How else can anyone explain the continuation of the 10 to one ratio between ZULU and ESVS? Simple - there is a contract still in place that sets the ratio at 10:1. We'll see where this goes after December 31. How much does your investment have to shrink by before you begin to question the management and direction of the company? When do you start to question the trail of misleading PRs that we never hear corrections for? Can we even be sure Chmiel is still there - we weren't told when anyone else left? Even if ESVS/ZULU/... has the greatest plan in the world, you've got to admit it probably isn't the wisest investment at this point. Do you still recommend friends buy in? How about family?

To: PartyTime who wrote (16961)	12/14/1998 7:44:00 PM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

"But no one has yet defined a worst-case scenario except individuals who have been continuously opposed to everything Zulu has attempted." Why not? Isn't it useful to know what a worst-case scenario is, no matter what your position is?

To: PartyTime who wrote (16961)	12/14/1998 7:48:00 PM
From: Jon Tara	Respond to of 18444

"the original NETZ and early ZULU used to put out a lot of press releases but got deeply criticized for doing so" They were never criticized for putting-out press releases. They were criticized for making promises that they didn't keep and, in one case, alluding to a non-existent takeover offer in an apparent (and successful, in the short-term) attempt to ride the coattails of another stock. I can't imagine that anybody would criticize them for putting out press releases accurately accounting for their successes.