Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (85273)	12/14/1998 3:57:00 PM
From: jim kelley	Respond to of 176387

CTC, Great post! We have to get those PRC congressmen out of congress! They are a threat to every free man and woman.

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (85273)	12/14/1998 4:25:00 PM
From: Fangorn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

**OT** CTC, RE >There is an old saying in the law: if the facts are against you argue the law. If the facts and the law are against you go after the prosecutor.< No wonder Clinton et al. have been so venemous in their attacks on first Starr and now Hyde, Barr et al. The facts and the law are clearly against Clinton so of course they are attacking the prosecutor. Your fancy little argument falls apart when we look at the foundation, which is sand. re >Here is an analogy. A man is accused of a crime. If he attempts to defends himself the prosecutor adds a count of perjury,< {{{In this case he claimed under oath that he didn't do it, though we all know he did...PERJURY}}} >and if the poor schnook hires a lawyer, the prosecutor then adds a count of obstruction of justice.< {{{This poor scnook claimed "client privilage" for discussions with government lawyers. No such "privilage" exists.}}} Your facility with words continues to amaze me but the fanciest argument in the world is only as good as the premise it is founded on. As your premise(s) in this are not valid the argument falls.