SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Justa & Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (2469)12/14/1998 5:14:00 PM
From: Lars  Respond to of 15132
 
*** Chip Article ***

Chip stocks take a beating
By Tiare Rath, CBS MarketWatch

NEW YORK (CBS.MW) -- Semiconductor issues suffered through a bloody Monday as investors cast doubt on the enthusiastic run-up seen in top-tier tech stocks in recent months.

The chip industry's biggest names took the biggest hit as Applied Materials (AMAT) dropped 2 13/16 to 39 1/8, a loss of 6.7 percent. Intel (INTC) fell 4 7/8 to 111 9/16 and Advanced MicroDevices (AMD) lost 1 5/8 to 28 9/16

"These stocks have had such an incredible run that profit-taking would just be … a typical sector move," said Tad LaFountain, semiconductor analyst with Needham & Co.

Between Dec. 8 and Oct. 8, when the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index bottomed out, the index has risen 89 percent. This was due in part to a widespread perception of a semiconductor industry rebound from a two-year slowdown.

"I'm a big believer in a cyclical upturn," LaFountain said. "The question is how much do you want to pay for it and how far in advance."

The losses hit the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index hard, making the index underperform the broader Nasdaq Composite Index, which fell 3.1 percent. See Silicon Stocks.

Other major losers giving back gains included National Semiconductor (NSM), which dropped 1 1/2 to 13 7/8. Friday, the stock rallied after analysts upped their earnings estimates but stopped short of recommending the stock. See full story.

In addition, LAM Research (LRCX) fell 1 7/16 to 16 3/8, and LSI Logic (LSI) lost 5/8 to 17 3/16.

Adding pressure to already-hurting semiconductor shares were and Xilinx (XLNX), which lost 2 3/16 to 54 7/8, and Altera (ALTR), down 2 11/32 to 53 3/16. Both stocks were downgraded by ABN Amro analyst David Wu because the stocks were nearing his 12-month price target of $60 a share.



To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (2469)12/14/1998 5:17:00 PM
From: Lars  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15132
 
*** Market & Politics ***

Impeachment, the Dow and your money
By Paul E. Erdman, CBS MarketWatch

SAN FRANCISCO (CBS.MW) -- America drives the world. Consumer spending drives America. The Dow Jones Industrial Average drives consumer spending. Or so goes current thinking.

It is the confusion about what impeachment is and is not that we should worry about.

From this can one can draw the logical conclusion that if an unexpected event suddenly undermines investor confidence, and thus the Dow, the party will soon be over for everybody.

Would the impeachment of President Clinton be such an event?

Barron's Alan Abelson, the dean of American commentators on financial matters, seems to think so. In Barron's latest issue he wrote the following:

"Our suspicion is that the roll call on impeachment will coincide with a noticeable increase in investor interest -- and investor apprehension. And we also believe that if Mr. Clinton is impeached, apprehension could turn into widespread distress, from which panic is only a few palpitations removed."

The problem is that the majority of Americans equate the impeachment of a president by the House of Representatives with his removal from office.

Nothing could be further from the truth. Impeachment is merely an act that refers the matter to the Senate for trial. A president's actual removal would only occur if, at the end of the impeachment trial, two thirds of the Senators voted to do so. Which is simply not going to happen. The votes are not there.

It is the confusion about what impeachment is and is not that we should worry about. If this coming Friday's headlines read "PRESIDENT IMPEACHED" who knows what type of irrational behavior might follow?

Frankly, I think that Wall Street has been right all along to simply ignore what has been going on in Washington. But the test of whether they will continue to be right will come this Friday.



To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (2469)12/14/1998 5:24:00 PM
From: Lars  Respond to of 15132
 
***Beware of bulls bearing theories
Flow of funds shows big investors' impact***

By Michael J. Bazdarich, CBS MarketWatch

LOS ANGELES (CBS.MW) -- It was a sickening third quarter for stocks, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average sliding from 9300 in July to the mid-7000s by late-September.

Recently released Federal Reserve data on the flows of funds among asset groups paint a telling picture of this period. The table below summarizes third-quarter flows in equities.

Right off, the table debunks the popular myth that the 1995-98 bull market was driven by individuals' purchases. Households have been net sellers of stocks since 1985, and they have sold at an extraordinary rate since 1995, to an annualized pace of more than $500 billion in early-1998.

However, households actually slowed down their sales of stocks in Q3, while prices were sliding. Households in fact stepped up their demand for stocks in the quarter.

Who bought and who sold (in billions)
1997
1st half 1998
Q3 1998

Households
($-490.2)
($-540.3)
($-297.3)

Financial institutions
$4.8
$7.0
$6.3

Insurance companies
$76.7
$74.2
$65.7

Pension funds
$104.1
$60.3
($-1.4)

Mutual funds
$160.6
$197.3
($-10.8)

Foreign investors
$64.2
$79.8
($-29.0)

Corporations
$81.8
$117.7
$266.7

Source: Federal Reserve Board (All flows are stated as annualized rates.)

Now, throughout 1995-97, households' direct sales of stocks far exceeded their "indirect" purchases through pension and mutual funds. It was huge corporate buybacks that powered the stock market then. Interestingly enough, corporate buybacks actually increased in Q3 1998, to a massive $267 billion.

So the household and corporate (buyback) demand for stocks actually rose in Q3 by a total of over $390 billion. So who was behind the rising selling pressure? Professional and foreign investors. Financial institution and insurance demand for stocks fell very slightly, by about $10 billion. However, mutual funds' demand plunged by over $208 billion, fiduciary demand (pensions and trusts) fell by nearly $62 billion, and foreign demand fell by nearly $109 billion.

The sum of all these flows is zero. It has to be, since every seller has a buyer and vice versa. Still, with equity prices valuations falling about $1.5 trillion in third quarter, it is clear that selling pressures (reduced demand) were the driver in Q3, and these pressures clearly centered on Wall Street (and foreign) professionals, not individuals on Main Street.

Market analysts have long worried about whether individual investors accustomed to rising prices could hang in there during a bear episode. Market bulls, meanwhile, have claimed that any bear challenge would be stemmed by steady demand from individuals. The flow-of-fund facts disparage both these views.

Apparently, it wasn't skittish individuals but professionals who drove the sell-off. Meanwhile, despite households stepping up their demand for stocks and despite a huge spate of corporate buybacks, prices plunged anyway.

Now, the bulls may laud individuals' fortitude and cite the partial Q4 rebound in equity prices as a vindication of bull trends. My own take, however, is equity prices are extremely high and likely overvalued, households' expectations for the market are unrealistically optimistic, and earnings are already well into a sustained deterioration.

As expectations come back to Earth, households will shift portfolio shares out of equities, and this will drive a prolonged stock correction. Anyone claiming that household purchases will buoy the market will get an education from an examination of recent funds flow data.



To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (2469)12/14/1998 5:32:00 PM
From: Lars  Respond to of 15132
 
*** Market Summary (Reuters) ***

NEW YORK, Dec 14 (Reuters) - Blue-chip stocks fell for the fourth session in a row on Monday, with the Nasdaq market hammered down more than 3 percent, as Wall Street was rocked by worries that U.S. President Bill Clinton may be impeached.

The Dow Jones industrial average ended off 126.16 points, or 1.43 percent, at 8,695.60.

In the broader market, declining issues swamped advances 2,271 to 799 on active volume of 695 million shares on the New York Stock Exchange.

The Nasdaq composite index plunged 62.39 points, or 3.07 percent, to 1,966.92 as investors cashed in profits from the recent run-up in technology stocks.

''The techs were the ripest for profit-taking,'' said Peter Coolidge, senior equity trader at Brean Murray & Co. ''People have been reluctant to sell them since they were so strong, but they ended their rally with a bang.''

Also unsettling was a nearly 9 percent sell-off in the Brazilian stock markets on concern about the country's efforts to deal with its fiscal problems.

Brazil's central bank was reported to be selling American dollars to deal with heavy outflows of U.S. currency.

Meanwhile, analysts said the choppy activity on Wall Street was likely to increase over the course of the week as the vote neared in the U.S. House of Representatives on whether to approve articles of impeachment against Clinton over his effort to cover up his affair with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky.

''Now that the potential for impeachment is growing, international money is starting to pull out,'' said Mara Glassel, vice president of Prudential Securities' Equity Focus Group. ''Foreign investors see this as a less politically stable place to put their money.''

If approved by the House, Clinton would become the second U.S. president to face an impeachment trial in the Senate. No one expects the Senate to muster the two-thirds majority needed to remove Clinton from office, but such a trial is widely expected to tie Washington in knots for months.

''Quite obviously the mood here has changed,'' said Peter Cardillo, director of research at Westfalia Investments. ''The market is perhaps beginning to derail itself from prospects of a year-end rally, but I'm not giving up hope.''

Mattel Inc. fell 8-1/16 to 22 after the world's largest toy maker became the latest company to whisk away hopes for a strong round of profit announcements at year-end.

The company said 1998 earnings would be one-third less than estimated as retailers cut back on toy orders to reduce inventory.

Mattel also said it was acquiring education software maker Learning Co. for $33 per share in stock, or $3.8 billion.
Learning Co. was down 2-15/16 at 25.

''There's a lot of worry out there,'' said Brad Weekes, head of block trading at Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette. ''We had seven Dow stocks warn about earnings in two weeks, so what's the next shoe to drop? And there's no question the impeachment is overhanging.''

Hughes Electronics Corp. was off 1-9/16 at 36-11/16 after company, which is a General Motors Corp. unit, said it will acquire U.S. Satellite Broadcasting Co. for $1.3 billion in a move to further strengthen its DIRECTV satellite television business. U.S. Satellite rose 2-13/16 to 12-7/16.

New England Electric System rose 5-7/16 to 48-7/16 on news that British-based National Grid Plc was acquiring the company in a deal valued at $4.6 billion.

Charles Schwab Corp. rose 2-1/16 to 41-7/16 after the discount brokerage house said it was entering the Canadian market by buying a small Toronto brokerage with around $120 million in customer assets.

The Standard & Poor's composite index of 500 stocks fell 25.26 points to 1,141.20. The American Stock Exchange index fell 9.77 to 647.99.

The NYSE Composite index of all listed common stocks was off 10.29 at 554.53. The average share was down 79 cents.

The Wilshire Associates Equity Index -- the market value of NYSE, American and Nasdaq issues -- was 10,423.369, down 220.214 or 2.07 percent.



To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (2469)12/14/1998 5:59:00 PM
From: Lars  Respond to of 15132
 
*** Companies Give Big Investors the Inside Scoop Part 1 of 3 ***

New York, Dec. 14 (Bloomberg) -- As Western Digital Corp.'s stock surged 37 percent on December 1, only a select group of people at an Arizona resort knew why the disk-drive maker was having its biggest one-day gain ever.

Most of the company's 3,700 shareholders couldn't explain the sudden spurt that added $427 million to Western Digital's market value in a few hours. They hadn't been invited to the Phoenician in Scottsdale, where investment bank Credit Suisse First Boston was treating a private party to warm lobster salad, seared Hudson Valley foie gras, fillet of turbot and roasted rack of Colorado lamb in between a series of closed-door meetings with top officials from more than 140 companies.

The Credit Suisse First Boston conference offered plenty of opportunities for the firm's clients to trade before the rest of the world learned what executives at the meeting were saying.
At one of these sessions, Charles Haggerty, Western Digital's chief executive, said business was getting much better. Some of his listeners, in a room with beige, silk- covered walls, reached for their cell phones and placed orders to buy the stock. Before the day was over, Western Digital had jumped 4 13/16 to 17 7/8.

Such briefings -- attended by invitation only -- are routine. During the past several months, executives at Dell Computer Corp., Barnes & Noble Inc., Northern Telecom Ltd. and Tellabs Inc. have provided enough insight in these private situations to prompt unforeseen price fluctuations, adding or subtracting billions of dollars in market capitalization in less than a day.

Big Incentives

''It sounds like insider trading to me,'' said Barbara Roper, director of investor protection for the Consumer Federation of America, a non-profit advocate for about 50 million people. ''The big players are getting information and getting a chance to trade on that information before it gets out to the rest of the market.''

And there are big incentives to keep it that way. Securities firms are selling ''access,'' said Michael Holland, who spent much of his 30 years in the investment business working at the Wall Street firms Credit Suisse First Boston and Salomon Brothers before forming his own money management firm. By arranging exclusive meetings between their preferred customers and chief executives, securities firms have a better chance of receiving more buy and sell orders, and the commission dollars that go with them.

''They're providing us with information,'' said Jon Burnham, chairman of Burnham Asset Management Corp., who has attended hundreds of these meetings in his 40 years as a professional investor. ''That's the point of these things for brokerages, to get information out and then to get commission dollars back for it, and they do it in spades.''
For their part, chief executives are only too willing to give the firms' analysts andselected investors the first word on market-moving news. Such intimacy creates the widest following for their company's stock and helps them put the best light on their results.
Same Information

Western Digital's Haggerty didn't engage in selective disclosure at the Credit Suisse First Boston conference, said Robert Blair, vice president of investor relations. ''Anyone who's called me for the past week has gotten the same information,'' Blair said, soon after Haggerty spoke.
The difference is no one who called Blair was in the same room -- which could seat only 160 people -- where Haggerty told investors the company had whittled its inventory of disk drives, boosted market share and planned to ship products incorporating International Business Machines Corp. technology earlier than expected. Haggerty declined to comment on his presentation at the Phoenician.

Other executives, representing companies from BMC Software Inc. to Intuit Inc., also made time in their busy schedules to spend a day at the Phoenician, playing the 27-hole golf course, dining on executive chef George Mahaffey's four-star cuisine and laughing at jokes from Dana Carvey, the comedian specially hired for the conference.
Credit Suisse First Boston, and dozens of other firms, can easily spend $4 million on events like this one, which included more than 500 guests, according to investment bankers familiar with the expenses.

No Individuals Allowed

Many of these conferences are annual, including NationsBanc Montgomery Securities' six-day meeting on growth stocks at the Ritz in San Francisco every September, and Hambrecht & Quist Group's week-long computer-industry gathering at the Westin St. Francis Hotel in the same city. The H&Q meeting this year drew executives from 320 companies.
While these may be the most overt examples of selective disclosure, the practice is widespread on a subtle level every day.

In a NationalInvestor Relations Institute survey of 227 companies, 99 percent said they invite professional money managers to participate in regular telephone conference calls. Only 29 percent welcome individual shareholders and just 14 percent allow news reporters on those calls, according to the institute, an association of 3,600 investor relations officers.
On July 21, Tom Meredith, Dell Computer's chief financial officer, told a select group of investors on a conference call that personal computer prices were still falling, even though analysts had expected them to recover. Dell, the best-performing stock in the Standard & Poor's 500 Index in 1996 and 1997, declined 4.4 percent in a couple hours, carving $3.3 billion out of its market value as big investors sold shares. Individuals who bought Dell shares that day did so unaware of Meredith's remarks.

''We do not engage in selective disclosure on our conference calls or in any other distribution of material corporate information,'' said T.R. Reid, a spokesman for Dell in Round Rock, Texas. The July 21 call contained no new, important information that should have been disclosed because the company had said in May that PC prices were falling, he said.



To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (2469)12/14/1998 6:00:00 PM
From: Lars  Respond to of 15132
 
*** Part 2 of 3 ***

A 'Running Start'

Big and small investors alike aren't convinced. ''It's not fair,'' said Nicholas Moore, who follows technology stocks for Jurika & Voyles, an Oakland, California-based money manager of $5 billion. By participating in Dell's July conference call, ''We would have a very big running start'' on an individual investor that day, Moore said. ''Why is that investor disadvantaged to that degree?''

Dell's July conference call ''is the kind of practice that perpetuates the belief that the little guy doesn't get a fair shake on Wall Street,'' said Roper of the Consumer Federation of America. Since July 21, when Meredith spoke to a select group of people, Dell shares have lagged those of some competitors, including Compaq Computer Corp., IBM and Sun Microsystems Inc. - - a contrast to the preceding 12 months when it outperformed all competitors in the market.
For many investors, getting an invitation to join a conference call is an opportunity to make money. ''If I hear something that I didn't know that is extraordinarily positive, I'll buy,'' said Philip J. Orlando, chief investment officer at Value Line Asset Management Inc. in New York, which manages $6 billion. ''If I hear something that is extraordinarily negative, I'll sell. I may pick up a (trading) ticket and buy or sell right there'' during a conference call.
A study this year by three University of Michigan professors found that during conference calls, stock prices swing more and bigger blocks of shares are traded than when there is no conference call -- signs that institutional investors are trading during the briefings. Those investors wouldn't bother listening if the calls only reiterated previously released information, wrote Richard Frankel, Marilyn Johnson and Douglas J. Skinner.

Equal Access

''This evidence implies that conference calls are informative, but that not all investors have equal access to the information in these calls,'' they wrote.
The top U.S. securities regulator says that kind of unequal access to information undermines the integrity of the market. ''As far as I'm concerned, that's cheating, and it's a stain upon our market,'' U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Arthur Levitt said in a Nov. 18 interview. ''We're clearly concerned about it, we're clearly looking for it.''
Levitt warned in February that companies and brokerages could face insider trading sanctions if analysts or investors profit from corporate news before it's available to the public. In an interview, he went further, urging companies to include reporters in their analyst calls.
The SEC has limited legal means to enforce what is essentially an issue of fairness, lawyers say.The courts have held that insider trading occurs only when an analyst or investor who gets inside information gives something to the company executive in return, said John Coffee, a Columbia University Law School professor who specializes in securities law.
Stock exchanges have regulatory power over listed companies, and the exchanges require full and fair disclosure of information that could affect trading. Still, the only sanction stock markets are allowed by the courts is to remove a company from the exchange, Coffee said. That's a blunt instrument that the exchanges are loath to use.

Intuit Sales

''It's a major problem for the SEC,'' said Coffee. ''We have a problem without a clear legal remedy.''

The Nasdaq Stock Market and the New York Stock Exchange say most companies are good about releasing news fairly. ''A vast number of the companies are in compliance and meet all of the listing standards, including disclosure requirements,'' a Big Board spokeswoman said.
Many companies say they avoid selective disclosure by issuing a press release before briefing big investors, and then confining their comments in the briefings to what's already been announced. That way, they say, all investors have similar access to information.
That doesn't work because analysts and investors often see tremendous import in comments that executives consider immaterial. Often, companies give details about their businesses that haven't been made available to the public.

In between visits to the Phoenician's cigar bar, golf course and its restaurant, Mary Elaine's, guests at the Credit Suisse First Boston conference had a chance to sit down with Intuit Inc. co-founder Scott Cook. He told them that advance orders for the 1999 version of Intuit's TurboTax software had already exceeded total sales of the 1998 version. While he was speaking, Intuit shares began rising and gained 11 percent, or 5 7/8, to close at 61 1/8.
Cook's presentation wasn't significant or selective because the company had previously disclosed that the 1999 version of TurboTax was selling well, said Larry Wolfe, senior vice president of Intuit's Tax Products Division. ''It was a confirmation that things are going the way we expected them to go,'' he said.

Ethical Requirement

Still, Wolfe acknowledged that Intuit hadn't previously disclosed that new orders exceeded total sales for the 1998 version.

Companies should see it as ''an ethical requirement'' to be evenhanded in distributing information, said Harvey Pitt, a partner in the securities law firm of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson in Washington. ''What's at stake here is how your existing or prospective shareholders are treated.''

On at least one front, companies have become more open in distributing news. The National Investor Relations Institute found this year that 26 percent of the companies in its survey said they would inform analysts before issuing a press release warning that earnings were likely to be disappointing. That's down from 40 percent in a 1995 survey.
The investor relations group recommends that companies allow reporters on conference calls to ensure that news gets broadly and fairly disseminated, though its chief executive acknowledges that most don't and can't be forced to.

''Companies are totally within their legal rights to restrict those conference calls to whomever they want,'' said Louis Thompson, chief executive of the group -- even if the results show that big investors get the first crack at important corporate news.



To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (2469)12/14/1998 6:01:00 PM
From: Lars  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15132
 
*** Part 3 of 3 ***

Northern Telecom

Northern Telecom shares plunged Sept. 29 when the company's chief financial officer, Wes Scott, warned a select group of shareholders and analysts that revenue growth in Asia and Europe would be disappointing in the second half of the year. Scott made his remarks so close to the end of the four-hour session that many in attendance were no longer paying attention, according to analysts who were there. As investors compared notes, some whipped out cell phones to call in sell orders to their trading desks, those in attendance said.
Northern Telecom shares slid 12 percent, knocking $3.2 billion off the company's market value. Four hours after the stock started falling, the company issued a public statement confirming what the pros already knew. ''We were surprised with the reaction in the marketplace,'' said Chief Executive John Roth.

Another telephone equipment maker, Tellabs Inc., shocked big investors on a Sept. 14 call with news that third-quarter profit and sales wouldn't meet estimates. By the time small investors could listen to a recorded replay, Tellabs shares, which had risen rose as much as 7 3/8 to 52 3/8 before the call, plunged as low as 36, losing about $1.7 billion in market value.
''The minute he said this quarter would be a penny light, people started dumping the stock,'' said Scott Vergin, a money manager at Lutheran Brotherhood, a not-for-profit group in Minneapolis that provides financial services to members of the Lutheran faith.
Barnes & Noble Inc. fell 9.4 percent Nov. 20 after the largest U.S. bookseller told analysts on a conference call that costs to advertise the company's Internet business would be greater than expected. Barnes & Noble fell 3 to 29 in trading of 3.9 million shares, five times the three-month daily average.

Invitation Only

Big shareholders of Corrections Corp. of America and sister company CCA Prison Realty Trust learned in face-to-face meetings with executives in early November that the companies could get as much as $600 million in the next 12 months through stock purchases by HSBC Holdings Plc. It wasn't until Nov. 12 that D. Robert Crants, president of CCA Prison Realty, made the planned investment public in an interview.

The Credit Suisse First Boston conference at the Phoenician, thehotel that savings and loan executive Charles Keating built, provided a hit parade of senior officers from some of the hottest companies. Even Microsoft Corp., which has the world's largest market capitalization and rarely disappoints any of its shareholders, dispatched its chief financial officer, Greg Maffei, to Scottsdale this month.

BMC Software Inc. shares gained 8 percent on Dec. 2 after Chief Financial Officer William Austin said the software maker's current quarter looked promising. Micron Electronics Inc. lost 12 percent after an executive warned of a price war for personal computers.
Credit Suisse First Boston didn't invite all investors to the conference, and only a handful of journalists were permitted to attend -- CNBC, the San Francisco Chronicle, the San Jose Mercury News, Forbes ASAP magazine, Upside magazine and Fortune. All agreed they wouldn't do same-day reporting of company presentations, said Cheryl Popp, a Credit Suisse First Boston spokeswoman.

Speaking Freely

Credit Suisse First Boston excluded Bloomberg News, Dow Jones News Service and Reuters from all meetings because their real-time format requires them to share news with readers as soon as they confirm it.

The firm limited the press because ''the amount of freedom that an executive feels he has in speaking is very closely correlated to who's in the audience,'' said Michael Kwatinetz, director of research for Credit Suisse First Boston's technology group. ''The things a CEO is willing to say change.''

Experts say that in the age of the Internet, it would be easy to let all investors get a fair shot at market-moving company information. Opening up closed meetings such as the Credit Suisse First Boston conference would be the first step because it would give all investors the news at the same time, they say.

Letting reporters listen in on all conference calls would mean that news services could transmit important news instantly, said Thompson of the National Investor Relations Institute. Individual investors would have access to news via the Internet or cable television channels that cover financial markets. Companies also could let individual investors listen in to calls via their corporate Internet sites.

Integrity at Stake

Advocates for individual investors say companies also need to think about the timing of their announcements to ensure a level playing field. Ideally, companies should release information while the market is open, from 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. New York time, said John Markese, president of the 180,000- member American Association of Individual Investors in Chicago.
Many companies, including Intel Corp. and Amazon.com Inc., issue earnings reports and hold conference calls after the market closes. Big investors can absorb the news and then buy or sell shares on electronic trading networks such as Instinet that offer a market when the exchanges are closed. That's a service most brokerages don't offer to small investors.
Individual investors' after-hours stock orders generally sit with their broker until 9:30 a.m. the next day, when regular trading begins. ''The institutions have already traded on it and you're last in line,'' Markese said. ''It has to be more public, and broadly public rather than these conference calls.''

For Levitt, the SEC chief, nothing less than the integrity of the U.S. stock market is at issue.
''If some individuals or organizations are getting information that others are not getting, that means our markets are no longer trustworthy and no longer credible, and that can't be tolerated,'' he said.
Andrew Filipowski, chief executive of Platinum Technology Inc., who spoke at the Credit Suisse First Boston conference, agrees. ''There's only one conclusion I can make'' about why a CEO wants to limit his audience to money managers, he said. ''He's going to tell these guys (something) he doesn't want other people to know. There are gray areas that are going to be crossed.''