Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (19566)	12/15/1998 10:10:00 AM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Bottom of the morning to you, Rev. Filth. >What are we to make of [Matthew 7:1-5 and John 8:3-11], Rev. Pilch? You do seem to be so very judgemental about people with the wrong political views.< I judge your filth, and I do it without reservation. I seem to be judgmental to you because you are on the wrong side of the truth, having here championed utter perversity. I condemn the filth you support, and were you not to try and peddle your foul dirt here as goodness, insulting those who by principle are compelled to reject it, then you would not have heard a word from me. Ultimately, I do not judge you. I have not the power to send you to your ultimate resting place, wherever it is. I judge you here for myself, determining by your actions that you are untrustworthy and unfit to be a partner with me for good. Ultimately, I leave you to your own filthy devices. Of primary importance to me is a judgement of your filth. I condemn it for what it is. As for the John 8 and Matthew 7 texts, verse 6 of Matthew 7 commands me to judge and I have done so. I therefore consider myself prohibited from discussing the verse with you in any serious manner. I nevertheless am not proscribed from correcting your error. Therefore, since I have first asked you to give your exegesis of the Scriptures (even telling you beforehand the precise text to which you would run), I expect you to explain the text. Then I will give comment. >Are your views perhaps so inerrant?< This is really quite irrelevant. You here have supported utter filth and depravity, and by such filthy fruit I know you. So then it is really quite reasonable that I better consider the views of men who reject filth over those of men who wallow in it. >It all seems quite curious to me. You seem almost like a Pharisee to me, with your stentorious prescriptions.< Well of course I seem Pharisaical to you. You are ignorant of the Pharisees and the wholesale hypocrisy extant in that group. I do not do as did the Pharisees. I judge your filth with full knowledge of the principle under which I judge. Indeed yes, I know full well that the moment I judge your filth, the same standard of judgement automatically applies to me. The Pharisees did not care to maintain such integrity. Indeed they went out of their way to lie, cheat and steal, this, while condemning others of the same. You do not know me, and therefore cannot say with knowledge whether I am a chronic liar, cheat and thief. So then your judgement of me is half-witted, as is typical of filthy liberals who judge others while claiming no one can judge them. God will judge as to whether I condemn your filth and yet do the same things I condemn. I say this knowing full well that I neither accept nor participate in the garbage you have here supported. I stand before God knowing He has protected me from such filth. I condemn your filth with a pure conscience.