SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sawtooth who wrote (19759)12/15/1998 9:27:00 AM
From: Jeff Vayda  Respond to of 152472
 
Just a net quote, showing the start of a split in the Nordic wall:
(from Phillips telecom site: telecomweb.com
A register site, Commenting on Ericsson chip rate 'comprimise':

<<Some other industry observers were also confused by the proposal. Nortel Networks [NT] Vice President of Strategic Market
Relations Peter MacLaren said Nortel actually supports 3.84 mcps as a better chip rate for W-CDMA than 4.096 mcps. The
4.096 mcps rate, "is a difficult chip rate to implement in a 5 MHz channel," MacLaren said.

However, he added, Nortel is "somewhat mystified by the Ericsson proposal as offering a compromise. I would tend to agree with
the cdmaOne community that moving from 4.096 to 3.84, or any other number if it's not 3.68, really does nothing for cdma2000."
The 3.84 proposal had been raised six months ago, he noted, and was "basically dismissed for the same reasons, so why Ericsson
is making it again in this context just mystifies us." If a consensus forms around 3.84, MacLaren said, Nortel will "probably end up
being supportive...but it doesn't do anything for the agendas Ericsson claims it does." >>

Also Phillps had a chart of providers in the US - divided up into pops and type. CDMA beat both TDMA and GSM, 2 to 1 (roughly 600 mill CDMA)


Things are darkest before the dawn....

Jeff Vayda