Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask Mohan about the Market -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (17405)	12/15/1998 10:04:00 AM
From: Jim S	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18056

actually, star absolved bill of almost everything... Not exactly the case, Skeet. What Starr said was that he didn't have enough "clear and convincing evidence" to present to Congress for possible articles of impeachment. In his testimony to the J. Committee, Starr made it clear that he felt that stronger evidence was needed to impeach than for regular legal proceedings, because of the inherent politicization of the proceedings. Starr very pointedly avoided comments on the President's legal vulnerability when he leaves office, and even more pointedly implied that the Worst Lady may also be in deep do-do for her participation in some of the scandals. So, let's not get the idea that Clinton's only problem lies in the current four articles of impeachment. Starr has enough evidence of their wrongdoing to keep them busy for quite some time. I think that whoever becomes our next president will be obliged to give limited pardons to both Bill and Hillary just to get them off the front pages. jim