Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RJC2006 who wrote (19754)	12/15/1998 1:27:00 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<< I hate to break the news to you but the American electorate has an attention span of about a week and by the time the year 2000 arrives most folks will be saying "Bill who?" >> Ho ha! Not only are you a racial bigot, but also an elitist! As one who identifies himself with 2nd graders, I don't think that it is proper for you to be standing in judgement and insulting the American people. An egotist without a mind. You are a strange combo! <g>

To: RJC2006 who wrote (19754)	12/15/1998 1:45:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I hate to break the news to you but the American electorate has an attention span of about a week and by the time the year 2000 arrives most folks will be saying "Bill who?" I do hope that this issue ends up in the Senate and drags on for months, resulting in the more vital "saving Social Security" and other key issues getting bogged down and unresolved when the year 2000 elections come up... There would be no point in the people blaming Clinton then. Besides, he is not up for re-election anyways. There would be no point in blaming the Democrats either, for it was not their vote that took the issue to the Senate. That leaves the Republicans and only the Republicans. Just what the Democrats need to make a clean sweep.