SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Machaon who wrote (19821)12/15/1998 2:37:00 PM
From: Dan B.  Respond to of 67261
 
Offer up a single scrap of evidence that the "truth" here is Ken Starrs false "truth". Maybe you'll have a leg to stand on. There is no such evidence. The opinion you express is based on empty wishfulness born of blind loyalty...NJMHOIMHO....Not Just My....



To: Machaon who wrote (19821)12/15/1998 2:45:00 PM
From: Dan B.  Respond to of 67261
 
Susan like all of us is required to testify and testify truthfully. To take her side is to say that you KNOW false evidence would be manufactured by Ken Starr to prove her truthfull testimony false. If Starr could do that, Clinton and/or Hillary would have been indicted in the matters she could testify about long ago. If anyone KNOWS of a single scrape of false evidence created by Starr against Clinton, against Susan McDougall, or anyone, please let us all know. Hers is a specious argument which holds no water.



To: Machaon who wrote (19821)12/15/1998 8:20:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
She was charged with a crime you dope. A criminal contempt citation is what landed her ugly, fat ass in jail. JLA