Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (19833)	12/15/1998 2:42:00 PM
From: RJC2006	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<<Look up the word "colloquialism" in the dictionary, idiot!>>> The use of the word "anyways" has always been a distinct characteristic of a mental midget. <<<Even assuming that GOP supporters remain GOP supporters (which in itself, is a big assumption), they still make up only 3 out of every 10 people in America. And even if all the 3 of them show up, it only takes half of the remaining 7 to show up and vote against them, and the GOP can be swept away.>>>> Cool, as the voting population is only about 33% they'd do rather well according to your figures. The calculations derived from your idiotic assumptions might have had more validity if you had said voters rather than just people. Learn to at least the bare minimum of debate essentials before opening your trap lamebrain.

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (19833)	12/15/1998 2:42:00 PM
From: RJC2006	Respond to of 67261

<<<Look up the word "colloquialism" in the dictionary, idiot!>>> The use of the word "anyways" has always been a distinct characteristic of a mental midget. <<<Even assuming that GOP supporters remain GOP supporters (which in itself, is a big assumption), they still make up only 3 out of every 10 people in America. And even if all the 3 of them show up, it only takes half of the remaining 7 to show up and vote against them, and the GOP can be swept away.>>>> Cool, as the voting population is only about 33% they'd do rather well according to your figures. The calculations derived from your idiotic assumptions might have had more validity if you had said voters rather than just people. Learn at least the bare minimum of debate essentials before opening your trap lamebrain.