SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (43454)12/15/1998 3:37:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572903
 
Tenchusatsu, <AMD was the one who had the rocky transition to 0.25 um,>
I think there is a common confusion here. When
the press (and you blindly repetiting it) says
"rocky transition", it creates an image that
AMD has had difficulties in launching of the
new 0.25 technology. This is not true, according
to known facts.

AMD was almost instantly successful in 0.25 -
the current store shelves are the proof. What was
difficult was exactly opposite to that transition:
difficult for AMD was to STAY in 0.35 and
push it to the sweet market spot of 233 MHZ
(at that time). This has nothing to do with
"transition", and the implication you want to make
about "transition to 0.18" has no grounds.

<I'll let Paul reply to this statement.>
Sure, what is the panorama out his garage door?
Hopefully something better than "Huh?"

- Ali



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (43454)12/15/1998 3:51:00 PM
From: kash johal  Respond to of 1572903
 
Tench,

Regarding AMD having to prove themselves.
You are of course correct.
However the information here is pretty compelling IMHO.
They already have a process: from MOS13
They have a brand new fab - specifically designed for Copper.
They have a good competitive design to go into it.

In terms of waiting for any of the tres BUFFOONS to post something of an objective response to the details here, I suspect we will have to wait for quite some time.

Regards,

Kash



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (43454)12/15/1998 4:52:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572903
 
Tenchusatsu - Re: "Not only is it calling its latest wafer fab a world-class plant but it claims it rivals any production facility of Intel Corp "'

Strong words for a Fab that won't produce its first functional wafers for another month ~!

Paul



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (43454)12/15/1998 5:03:00 PM
From: Maxwell  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1572903
 
Katmai Sucks:

gamespot.co.uk

Maxwell