Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (17268)	12/16/1998 9:31:00 AM
From: BGM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Kim: Two very good posts. Thanks for your analysis. Brad Mertz

To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (17268)	12/18/1998 12:26:00 AM
From: sh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Kim, Pardon my ignorance, but it seems to me that the difference between assay and recovery processes is a matter of scale -- the former use a much smaller sample than the latter. However, under both scenarios, if you come out with a positive result, you come out with precious metal(s), and therefore (at least to this lay mind), recovery of the PMs. If I'm wrong, please explain. It may be that you need to be a little more explicit with me. Can it be that the assay will produce PMs that were not in the dirt but rather placed as part of the testing procedure? Thanks, sh