SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (43501)12/15/1998 10:45:00 PM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 1573092
 
Re: "Fine. I'm sure we'll get into an argument over what low K means at the time, but who cares...it's just a case of beer."

I picked up a case of Fosters for <$10 tonight (12 bottles), so like you say who cares? I'd bet him myself but I think he may be right...

Even if Yousef is wrong and AMD does have a .18u copper process in '99, based on IBM's Cu process performance, AMD will still be behind Intel's .18u AL process which is truly in a class of it's own.

EP



To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (43501)12/15/1998 10:59:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1573092
 
Kevin - Re: " I'm sure we'll get into an argument over what low K means at the time, but who cares...it's just a case of beer.

Low-K Beer?

Less filling, eh?

Paul



To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (43501)12/15/1998 11:15:00 PM
From: Yousef  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573092
 
Kevin,

Re: "Fine. I'm sure we'll get into an argument over what low K means at
the time, but who cares...it's just a case of beer."

I agree ... but ... It will make the AMD thread a "more interesting"
place to be.

Make It So,
Yousef