Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jim kelley who wrote (85534)	12/16/1998 12:21:00 AM
From: richard surckla	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 176387

I don't post often but here's my 2 cents... Perjury is lying under oath. The subject matter is not material. Lying under oath about how much coffee you drank this morning, or what time you went to bed is not material... only the fact that you lied under oath... which by definition is PERJURY... so says the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES! When you sear to tell the truth and you DON'T, and it is permitted because it is a SMALL LIE then we have the problem of who will decide if it is a small lie (which is ok) and a big lie (which is not)? Where, and whom shall draw the line? And as far as the SEX part that you brought up, Clinton says this was not sex! And just for food for thought... if when Monica was giving Clinton his HUMMMM job and this was not sex... then what is it called when homosexuals get get together... petting, reading a book, or just having oral conversation. Please give me a break!

To: jim kelley who wrote (85534)	12/16/1998 2:04:00 AM
From: T L Comiskey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

jim......re:"Perjury about a matter of state to hide a treasonous act would be impeachable. But perjury about your age to a court in a sex trial would not." Likewise..if Mike Dell lies under oath about an affair..the shareholders should NOT be able to unload his silly a$$ for protecting it........Just My view...ps...I voted for( NOT DOLE !).......<g>....Tim

To: jim kelley who wrote (85534)	3/11/1999 6:43:00 PM
From: SoliRA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

I just looked at my mail. It's old news now, but say that Clinton raped my Mother or Sister, just average U.S. Citizens. What happens? It's not a high crime against "the State". Just against people. The one good thing about the whole mess is that Paula Jones, one of us little people, thanks to a stained dress went from an image of a low-life chasing $100 bills trolled through a trailer court, to someone with a credible story. And $800,000 settlement. I just hate it when the big guys walk all over a lowly citizen, and then claim it's alright for the sake of "the State". Besides, my personal opinion is that Clinton has allowed Los Angeles-Threatening missile and nuclear technology to pass to the Chinese. Very few actions leave stained dresses - many of them more substantial. Bob.