SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (85557)12/16/1998 2:54:00 AM
From: richard surckla  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
My, My, My... must have hit a nerve...

No games. Material is material or is it? Depends on how you define material? Do you define it in the same manner as "is is" or alone as "alone depending on where you are at at the time?" But then that depends on how you define AT? At meaning there or AT meaning time?

The key word to the Supreme Court that you stated "misstatement". A misstatement is a misstatement. A deliberate lie is a lie and not a misstatement.

Courts define materiality. Yes I agree.

When a Superior has sex with a underling, consensual or not, is considered "sexual harassment" in the federal government employment scene, military, and private business. Henry Hyde has to have an accuser!

If you believe that Paula Jones didn't have a case then please explain the large settlement AFTER THE CASE WAS DISMISSED? And why the judge in that case is STILL considering bringing charges against Clinton for lying under oath in her court?

"exclusively coital?" I have my own thoughts on this but it's not important. The judge knew she was looking for $$$$. She also knew she was claiming that he asked her to "kiss it," and not to have intercourse with her. Therefore, this is the President of these United States, lets limit it to "coital."

No changing of the mind.

As far as Clinton's extramarital relationships I could care less, as long as his finger isn't on the HOT BUTTON while he is having an orgasim and twitches while NOT HAVING SEX performed on him.

This is my last response to you on this subject. Reason: You can't see the trees for the forest. Good investing to you. and even after Clinton is impeached by those "that know not what they do" DELL will rise again just as Clinton's penis will.



To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (85557)12/16/1998 5:32:00 AM
From: nihil  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 176387
 
RE: did court assume everything Paula said was true?

Yes indeed. In granting a summary judgment for the defense, the judge assumes every issue in question is favorable to the plaintiff, and still finds that there is no case. It's what happens when a plaintiff can't make a prima facie case. The judge has no discretion, but must so decide if the facts fall that way. Federal courts are only open to cases and controversies. No controversy = no case.