Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TMMI - Total Multimedia -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DR. MEADE who wrote (11872)	12/16/1998 11:04:00 AM
From: Larry Panik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19109

Dr. Meade, I hope you are not trying to make a comparison here. Two different cases. BUT it is an interesting decision. Maybe we can get the attorney firm to represent us shareholders? Larry

To: DR. MEADE who wrote (11872)	12/16/1998 11:13:00 AM
From: Don Johnson	Respond to of 19109

That's an idea of what to do with a certain someone and get some market cap as well. If not whoever that clown is then out of the hide of RB who refuse do anything about an abusive poster when brought to their attention. Tom et al have claimed lost business and you know what that has done to our investment. Anyone good at tracing messages?

To: DR. MEADE who wrote (11872)	12/16/1998 12:31:00 PM
From: Arnie Doolittle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19109

Doc, I don't know a thing about American Eco but I do know that TMMI hasn't put out enough info on itself for anyone to libel it. That begins with financials, extends to daily activities (are there any?), continues to # of shares o/s, % owned by insiders, shares sold by insiders, communication with shareholders, annual meetings, etc., etc., ad nauseum. As far as we know, they don't have a telephone # or a business address, other than someone's house. So far they haven't mounted a decent legal attack against a legitimate source - Iterated. And what are their chances against Jackson? As I understand it from posts on this board, they can't even serve all the people in the Jackson suit. What possible claim would they have against any bulletin poster - whether it be shark or whomever? And if they can't move legitimate legal claims forward, why would they even go to the effort to pursue bogus claims against bulletin board posters? Arnie