SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SecularBull who wrote (85630)12/16/1998 11:18:00 AM
From: nihil  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
re: town meetings in the Constitution

Check out that part (Amendment I) about the right peacably to assemble ...



To: SecularBull who wrote (85630)12/16/1998 11:22:00 AM
From: MichaelW  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
OT: One of the arguments that I've heard for impeaching Clinton is that we must make clear that everyone is equal before the law. Do they really expect us to believe that? No, but they have to say it.

MW



To: SecularBull who wrote (85630)12/16/1998 11:36:00 AM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
OT I believe myself to be a purist in my interpretation of the law, and the enforcement of it.
Ah.. this takes me back to the days of my youth. The town where I grew up was ruled by fundamentalists who believed in the inerrancy of the bible and could not be flexible on any issue lest they begin to question even the slightest word of that book.

The funniest thing about this whole affair is that it was the right's outrage at the Read My Lips, No New Taxes lie that brought Clinton to office in the first place.

TP (Who notes that it is the brown skinned people from across the tracks who govern in that town now).