Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tomato who wrote (1793)	12/16/1998 1:42:00 PM
From: Walt	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2251

Good questions. 1. The results we are awaiting are from the dyke so they should be similiar to other holes in dyke and bulk sample. 2. Zone 186 is a kimberlite breccia and apparently it looks like it has been reworked, or moved into position, it probably is far less economic for two reasons, lower kimberlite grade and the amount of wall rock mixed in. Just what its relationship to the dyke is, is still uncertain. 3.The possible pipe is even more problematic. It should have a grade similiaar to dyke but depending onn size may have cooled slower and had more reabsorbtion of diamonds, hence may have less diamonds or ones not as good. Hope that helps. The computer I'm using is an antique it it is some slow. regards Walt