Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Walt who wrote (10584)	12/16/1998 4:36:00 PM
From: ddl	Respond to of 26850

That did it. I misread the "Management discussions" page 2 where 3.96 c/t were discussed and thought that was for overall grade of the 2 bulk samples, but I see now that micro analysis was never done on those pits samples. Makes sense to value drill results against a standard. Reminds of when the Love Canal area of N.NY wanted to test the contaminated soil against "clean" soil so they said, "let's dig a sample of soil from the Church yard". Guess what?, when they dug it out they hit a few more barrels of contaminants. :-) I guess after these results, we might be getting a good flow of drill core analysis as compared to the dyke from the NW peninsula. - Thanks - denis

To: Walt who wrote (10584)	12/16/1998 6:58:00 PM
From: maintenance	Respond to of 26850

Hi Walt, Glad your back with us. Your explanations and analogies have the clarity of the best diamonds. Thanks. So, in your opinion what do we look for from the remaining samples? Cheers