SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sea_biscuit who wrote (20443)12/16/1998 2:31:00 PM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 67261
 
>>You don't get it. If the Dems were really partisan, as you allege, they could have all voted "Aye" to that particular article of impeachment and it would have made it to the final list. As simple as that.

No, you don't get it - they had no grounds. How many times do I have to state it!

The Reps have the grounds on Clinton.



To: sea_biscuit who wrote (20443)12/16/1998 2:32:00 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
The Dems were just as partisan. The rules adopted in the current impeachment come from Watergate. They didn't limit the impeachment inquiry then either. Some of the idiots were arguing Nixon wasn't entitled to legal representation. They were not only partisan but in violation of human rights.



To: sea_biscuit who wrote (20443)12/16/1998 3:03:00 PM
From: RJC2006  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<<You don't get it. If the Dems were really partisan, as you allege, they could have all voted "Aye" to that particular article of impeachment and it would have made it to the final list. As simple as that.>>>

No, once again you dipstick, it's you who don't get it. It would have never gotten out of committee. What's has got you so frantic is that Clinton didn't kill all the witnesses!