Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Machaon who wrote (20552)	12/16/1998 5:35:00 PM
From: RJC2006	Respond to of 67261

<<<Now, why doesn't it surprise me that you, a Republican male, thinks that women's health issues are a rather useless issue. For years, women were told that their PMS symptoms were psychological, or were from the stress of child rearing, or other such rot.>>> Yeah...they were told this from the same crowd that administers abortion you numb nut! By the way, maybe you should attempt to get my take on the issue before you eat all that shoe leather next time. <<<Women have finally getting focus on their health issues. The Republican Party would like to turn the clock back on women's health issues! This is not an idle threat.>>>> Yeah, but unfortunately their issues are easily pushed aside whenever the latest gay disease hits the sheets. <<<You are anti Clinton, anti Women's health issues, anti Streisand, anti-chicken, anti Travolta, but pro knee pads for yourself!>>>> Blah...blah...blah...you're such an enormous ignoramus. There isn't one instance that I have shown to be against women's health issues you pompous ass. Now Streisand, Travolta, Tyson's Chicken you can sign me up any time. But you'll have to excuse me. The mental image of you there on the Oval Office floor with those hot pink knee pads on just a waiting for ol' Billy to unzip his fly and present you the Presidential seal is enough to gross out anyone. You're a stereotypical left-wing nut case who makes assumptions and stuffs their boot down their mouth before they even investigate the facts. <<<Excuse me, for I usually don't use insults >>> No Robert...just being in your presence is enough.... <<<Ok, ok. Play with words, if you will. But, will a fetus soul have a better life up in Heaven, than a chance of going to the real Hell by being born here on Earth?>>>> You know, just reading your words...the way you put the sentence together tells me you're a fool. "Playing with words" my ass. Look at what you wrote and compare that to the tenets of the religion you so passionately despise. Let me give you a little theology lesson. According to Christian beliefs, yes heaven is a better place then Earth however the time when innocent human beings are to go there isn't supposed to be decided by pointy headed left wing wierdos. Oh but I forget...fetuses aren't human beings even if the DNA says otherwise. <<<<Heaven is a basis for the entire Christian belief.>>>> Total and undeniable dunce. The ENTIRE Christian belief does not concern itself with heaven as the core belief. According to Christ you could believe in heaven all you want and you aren't goin' there. Listen closely Oral Robert, the ENTIRE Christian belief has to do with one thing and one thing only. That is that Jesus Christ died on the cross as God's sacrifice for the sins of the believer. Everlasting life is granted for the belief in this and not for any belief in heaven. To those that don't wish to move this into a religious discussion my apologies but this imbecile wishes to argue religion and he can't even get the most basic facts correct. <<<I do not feel that I am out of line asking the "fetus soul" question. It begs an answer.>>> Yes, and you have not only gotten your answer but now you should be feeling as though you are in Hell right now as you fan the flames from that fire lit up on your rear end.