Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (20913)	12/16/1998 11:08:00 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<< You're the incredible idiot who's justifying this attack on the basis of delaying impeachment. >> What an incredibly stupid remark. Not at all. Once again you twist the words and meaning of others, with a different opinion, for you own feeble minded gain. Why do you feel that it is so important to make your point that you have to lie and insult? I favor anything that delays these hearings. Any delay might give calmer and more reasonable minds the chance to end them. If Tom Delay farted in Congress and that caused the hearings to be delayed indefinitely, I would've been just as happy. On the other hand, I support this attack on Iraq 100%. I guess that you are totally against this attack on Iraq. << Anyone with half a brain and half a heart would want military action to be swift. >> What if, because it is swift, the operation is a failure? What if an extended operation gives us a better chance to have this world a safer place? You are the one with half a brain. You were too stupid to understand that when I said that the hearings were indefinitely delayed, it had nothing to do with the length of the military operation. But you knew that, didn't you? So, instead of you having half a brain, I just call you disingenuous. << Especially now we learn that he did this against the wishes of the UN. >> Bullshit. Are you totally opposed to this attack? Why not say it instead of trying to be deceiving? Your buddies from Russia were opposed to the attack. Nice going, siding with the Russians against the US. << Most of the people who served in Vietnam were volunteers >> Where did you pull this little gem out of? Isn't it nice when you place a lot of insults in your note to support your weak positions, and have to read a bunch of insults in return? Do you have bad manners at work and at home also?