Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (20985)	12/17/1998 2:25:00 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I gave you that. Even though I have my doubts. The obvious evidence of pervasive dishonesty on bc's part is the issue for me now. Not necessarily even what should be done to him for it. The issue now is, what is my relationship with the man. Not one of trust and as I've stated many times, our support for him as our elected official is underwritten by trust. He has no authenticity as our representative if it isn't backed by the trust we have lent him. And if it is about sex you can work up enough confidence to maybe buy one far fetched possibility. But then all the others are looming. And they are not accusations of his right wing political foe. They are the does he was unsuccessful with from his own back yard. One had it in for him and they both had a reason they couldn't disclose the details that would clear him? mmmm...Maybe. All of them, not likely. Especially when he keeps coming up as the liar of the crowd. They are not getting caught in lies, he is over and over and over again. I am really trying to find all plausible stretches here man. I just can't make it. How do you do it so easily?