Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BGM who wrote (17283)	12/17/1998 11:55:00 AM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Brad, Okay, now I understand..... I think that naxos should eventually explain those things, yes. I dont think it should be remotely the number one priority, IMO. Although, some are more important than others. S.A. should be explained eventually, but I dont really care all that much, personally. LeDoux, I definitely would like to know the whole story, the sooner the better. J/L, I think they should explain, but realize there may be reasons why that may be difficult at the moment.I am in no rush, because in my own mind, I am placing zero hope and thought on J/L. I also realize that Bob G., just got in office, and deserves some time. I like what I have seen in the short period he has been around, and hope that the current track is more beneficial and effective than the other paths that we have undertaken. I have to admit that I am very intrigued by the prospects of having some sort of mini pilot plant up and running in the near term. As far as proper reporting and proper business guidelines, I am all for them, but that is a very nebulous statement. the reason I say that, is that most jrs. wont report anything until they have completed all testing. that is considered proper in most circles, but I dont think that you would feel that way, and I certinly wouldnt have the patience for it myself. Therefore, what becomes proper? Mark