Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (17285)	12/17/1998 12:58:00 PM
From: BGM	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Tom: You say "this is the most relevant progress that has been made in 2 years". Don't you think you are way way way ahead of the game considering it is: 1. One test 2. Not certified 3. Not duplicated 4. No economics are associated with it Why is this more important than clarifying Ledoux who did many certified assays that they claim to stand behind? Are their numbers suspect due to tampering or some other explanation? If they had "problems" for some "reason", why is that not a concern here? It is incredible too me how we can head in a new tangent and disregard the same pattern that existed when we headed in new tangents before. Explanation of "history" is vital to not repeating it. I do not believe Bob Gardner did this shift on his own and in the time he has been there. It is a movement that involved past and current management. It needs to be understood in light of those past issues. Brad Mertz