Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : James Cramer -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (71)	12/17/1998 4:00:00 PM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 766

I find what happened to you as rather funny. Don't take it personal and I hope that you can see some humor in it, too. You would never be removed for any amount of time from the show for talking up a stock. Gosh actually talking a stock down and on CNBC ... heh heh heh. Whatever happened to whatsizname ... uh Dorfman? You would never hype a stock you were selling at the same time like Jeff Vinik would you? No don't answer that ... heh heh heh.

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (71)	12/17/1998 4:25:00 PM
From: Bo Didley	Respond to of 766

I watched the CNBC interview Cramer said he knew very little about WAVO. What he did know was that they have very few recognized customers, that the stock is a fraud-u-net, that he wanted to short 25k shares but couldn't because Goldman Sachs said they had no shares to loan despite him wanting to short, and that he spoke for and in behalf of Allen Greenspan when he said that "Allen GreenSpan does not want WAVO to go up". That is what I heard when I watched the interview. bo

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (71)	12/17/1998 4:37:00 PM
From: Bo Didley	Respond to of 766

So you are the real Cramer? By reading your posts, it sounds like it. Here is a thought -regarding "shorting WAVO".... From what you "said" on CNBC, and what you are claiming you tried to "imply", after the fact, are two different things. hmmmm bo

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (71)	12/17/1998 4:57:00 PM
From: cicak	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 766

Hi James: from a previous post of mine: <Of course, I'm sure we'll see a lot of naysayers because they have nothing better to do with their time than complain.> And sure enough.... Regards, Phil

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (71)	12/17/1998 5:29:00 PM
From: Tim Luke	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 766

james. by posting here you are just making yourself look worse....

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (71)	12/17/1998 6:11:00 PM
From: KZAP	Respond to of 766

CNBC is wrong. And Tim Luke, I disagree. <<by posting here you are just making yourself look worse.... >> One post sure doesn't do it. Of course he probably can't stick around long. It would cause him too many problems. JMHO KZAP

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (71)	12/17/1998 8:05:00 PM
From: TsioKawe	Respond to of 766

I agree Ridiculous!!

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (71)	12/18/1998 12:33:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Respond to of 766

Mr. Cramer, I think it's your "fraud-u-net" comments on the air within the context of the WAVO discussion that is a potential problem. I frequently watch CNBC and have always enjoyed your delivery, but when I heard you say that, I thought.....whoops!.... bp

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (71)	12/18/1998 12:35:00 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 766

Why do you think it is libelous? Just because it is inaccurate? Do you have facts which support the position that the statement was intended to injure you, and was made with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of the truth?

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (71)	12/21/1998 9:53:00 AM
From: Gary E	Respond to of 766

Hi Jim, I have just found this thread an want to tell you that your style is to be commended. So old guard, take your best shot. Keep trying. I am not going away and I am not backing down. Heck, I'm just getting started. And, get this, what doesn't kill me, does indeed make me -- and the revolution that we all know is going on -- stronger. Your character and teachings will make everyone better, maybe even the old guard ? .......na........they are what they are. You have my respect and support. Thanks HG