SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask Mohan about the Market -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wildstar who wrote (17491)12/17/1998 4:55:00 PM
From: Bosco  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18056
 
<ot> g'day all again - like E, I guess I am an addict too [maybe that's why I purposely don't go to those impeachment threads <g>] Speaking of "sin" and "crime," and with E's comment on the Papacy, somehow I conjure up Galileo in my mind. Many of us know he was one of the giants in astronomy and modern science. One of the not so widely known allegations [offhand, I don't have hard material to support my memory, which has been fading as I age <g>, so therefore 'allegation'] is that he had to retrack [part of] his scientific theory when the Church showed him the gallotine. If it is true, the crime and the sin are all tangled up. In order to avoid a sin [punishable by death back then, mind you,] he committed a crime and a sin against his church of "Scientific Truth." Imagine all the fellow scientists of his times who had held him in high esteeem. Wretched betrayal! But hey, it was easy for them to feel the pain of betrayal when their neck was not on the line [uh, gallotine!]

Anyway, to be fair, I guess I understand Richard's feeling [and many others who share similar feeling.] These days, we need a hero. Personally, I'd go beyond E's idea of a priest. A hero begins at home. If Richard wants his infant child to grow up with integrity etc., don't abdicate the responsibility to the President. Not the President, not the priests, not the sport stars, not even the teachers, but the parents are the source of integrity [but let's hope not rigidity.] Of course, jmho

best, Bosco