Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DD™ who wrote (21697)	12/17/1998 10:55:00 PM
From: max	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<Several key differences. Livingston didn't expose his penis to a government employee in an unwanted fashion and ask that employee for oral gratification. Livingston did not have sex with a subordinate at the workplace. Livingston did not lie in front of a federal grand jury. DD>> But but but ...he had SEX! That's all this is about isn't it? You can be impeached for telling the truth about SEX can't you? Max

To: DD™ who wrote (21697)	12/17/1998 11:01:00 PM
From: miraje	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Livingston didn't expose his penis to a government employee in an unwanted fashion and ask that employee for oral gratification. Livingston did not have sex with a subordinate at the workplace. How do you know? Have the details of his affairs been published on the internet yet? Livingston did not lie in front of a federal grand jury. Perhaps because federal grand juries are rarely convened for the purposes of a sexual witch hunt.

To: DD™ who wrote (21697)	12/17/1998 11:08:00 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

<< Livingston didn't expose his penis to a government employee in an unwanted fashion and ask that employee for oral gratification. >> Great point! You have won this round of the debate. Do you want to know why? With the new Republican Family Values, as long as you don't expose you penis to a government employee "in an unwanted fashion", you can get a standing ovation from the Republican Party for "only" cheating on your wife with multiple affairs! I want to see the new Republican Platform on Family Values. It might read like this: "We Republicans think that cheating on, and betraying your family, for years, is ok as long as you don't expose your penis to a government employee." I wonder if that will fit on a bumper sticker?

To: DD™ who wrote (21697)	12/17/1998 11:27:00 PM
From: j g cordes	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

DD.. when "your boy" is forced to hang his head in mock shame you can't find the courage to say dip. How do you know what kind of sex it was.. maybe he's into weird stuff and parades around in a chicken suit for all we know. Maybe they did it on a public highway using our tax dollars! None of this is our business and it wouldn't have come up if the Republicans hadn't made sex a political issue. Now everyone will just have to fry in the fat for awhile. I wonder who's next?