Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (85958)	12/18/1998 9:39:00 AM
From: Jerry Olson	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 176387

HEY ALL YOU DELLHEADS I just bought 1000sh. of DELL again at 66 3/4....looking for ??????? this is a positional trade till earnings.....

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (85958)	12/18/1998 9:45:00 AM
From: Reginald Middleton	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 176387

<Although Livingston can be accused if being a pig and worthless dirtbag for his transgressions, he cannot be accused of lying under oath. Your implication of "double standard" is not germane to the issue. Clinton lied and asked others to do so for him.> Clinton had four independant legal experts state, in writing, that he did not perjure himself under oath. Perjury is a technical legal term, and is not the same as misleading. It is not as if Clinton did not have the legal resources to ascertain the safest course of action under the circumstances. Either he perjured himself or he didn't. The acid test is whether a pure legal litmus paper will be applied or a partisan paper...