Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ericsson overlook? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: straight life who wrote (2436)	12/18/1998 9:55:00 AM
From: Paul Shread	Respond to of 5390

Why didn't ERICY warn for 2000 while they were at it? The name of this thread is starting to look awfully appropriate. They've got to lose that ridiculous two-year product cycle AND speed up their 1999 models, or Nokia will continue to eat their lunch, which is fine with me, as I now own more than twice as much NOK.A as I do ERICY, and the gap is getting bigger everyday.

To: straight life who wrote (2436)	12/18/1998 10:34:00 AM
From: Mika Kukkanen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5390

Taichi: I think it is about time that the truth be known concerning CDMA (in general) IPR. That is Qualcomm are only one company with patents in this field. I have so far come across numerous companies that hold IPR with regard to CDMA and WCDMA. The question that the analysts and journalist ask, if they are negative about Qcom is, "Who the hell are they?". As I said they are just one company and yet the most intransigent in the issue. The reason of course is money, as it is for any company, but the fact is the industry have always "pooled IPR" and Qualcomm are not interested. The much touted NTT and GSM operator release hasn't appeared yet, it was meant to this morning. After much searching I haven't found it. It may prove to be a turning point. Has anyone seen it?