Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : shopping.com (IBUY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (269)	12/18/1998 1:58:00 PM
From: afrayem onigwecher	Respond to of 435

We find it hilarious that a positive news release has generated such an uproar from this short seller. Its getting a little hot in the kitchen for the shorts. Suggest you do that and cover before you lose any more money.

To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (269)	12/18/1998 8:14:00 PM
From: Arcane Lore	Respond to of 435

I have found the reason for the apparent contradiction of your having been notified of a document the day before it was filed. It has nothing to do with EST vs PST. Instead it turns out that most Edgar forms filed after 5:30 p.m. ET (and before midnight) are assigned the next day as their filing date (despite the fact that it's all handled electronically so that an exact timestamp is potentially available). There are some exceptions but NT 10-Q's aren't among them. Also - obviously it's better if a company files within the time limits. If they can't, it's equally obvious they should file an NT submission. I have no complaint whatsoever about IBUY having done so under the circumstances described in the filing. I would have liked to have seen a little detail regarding the conditions of the major financing in the NT. However, hopefully this will be provided in a timely fashion in the actual 10-Q.