Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ballard Power -world leader zero-emission PEM fuel cells -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkeye who wrote (3434)	12/18/1998 11:03:00 AM
From: Stephen O	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5827

Hawkeye That was a stupid comment. Any poster worth his salt would check the other msgs posted on other threads. That would show it was obvious that I am not Sid T. Our writing styles are different and I have posted very negatively on the CLCK thread as well as very positively on threads like Silent Witness and Black Hawk. I am opinionated, I agree with Sid T that I don't think Ballard is worth its current mkt cap. It is still a spec and a highly priced one.

To: Hawkeye who wrote (3434)	12/18/1998 11:25:00 AM
From: Sid Turtlman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5827

Hawkeye: What deception are you talking about? Since when did I pretend to be two different people? I am Sid here, and post under CSMultrum there. There is a Motley Fool thread, but I haven't bothered to post anything there. You are "Hawkeye" (whatever that means - that isn't even one person's real name) here, and ? on Yahoo, and ? on Motley Fool. Want to point out to us where there is a rule saying a person must post under the exact same name in SI, Yahoo, and MF? You are the one trying to stir up a personality battle because you haven't shown yourself capable of intelligently criticizing the contents of my posts. I will be away from a computer for a few days, so during that time why don't you try dealing with issues, rather than personalities, and perhaps discuss my post from earlier today covering the American Methanol Institute site. I am sure you disagree with my opinion, so now you will have several days to try to refute what I said there. If, like some of the people on the Yahoo thread, you want to argue facts and issues, I would be delighted to maintain a civil relationship with you. If all you want to do is continue your personal attacks, then my description of you as a mindless cult member will have to stand.