Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (40020)	12/18/1998 11:42:00 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Disagree that Judge Starr is not accountable to Judge Holloway. Clinton always had the ability to get Judge Holloway to rule on his motions, and so she did. A number of the points that Clintonistas are making were already ruled on by Judge Holloway, e.g., that Monica and her mother were not treated fairly. Clinton lost, but I don't dispute that he has the right to keep attacking Judge Starr, since he has nothing else in his favor. If you want to believe that Janet Reno appointed Judge Starr to carry out a vendetta for the vast right-wing conspiracy, I can't stop you. If you believe that Judge Holloway is in Starr's pocket, I can't help you. If you think there is not enough evidence in those 6,000 pages in the Rayburn building, I can't convince you. I am just trying to point out that every argument you make has been adequately dealt with already by people without an agenda.