Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nihil who wrote (22510)	12/19/1998 9:30:00 AM
From: Michael Sphar	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

It would also be very illuminating to see your rather detailed analysis applied retroactively to the most recent prior attempt to impeach a President. Yes, I am speaking of President Nixon. How goes the (other high) misdemeanors in that case ? Was there a lynching that I missed ? I thought all that happened was some debate on 4 articles of impeachment so far...

To: nihil who wrote (22510)	12/19/1998 10:07:00 AM
From: mrknowitall	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Curious, nihil, which perjuries of congressmen would you bring charges for? BTW - the various commanders of the armed forces would follow the orders of the President. A military rebellion against their commander-in-chief is far-fetched; career officers would resign, not rebel. Their oath does not give them the kind of wiggle-room the liar-in-chief has. Mr. K.