SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Source Media SRCM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pluvia who wrote (1972)12/19/1998 4:57:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3015
 
Ack! Yes, this part of the discussion changes things.

On the "It's Still Irrelevant" side:
Because of problematic implementations between the various Java Virtual Machines, there's been some backlash against Java among high-end developers. "Write Once, Debug Everywhere" sucks. I see larger corporate sites replacing their java applets with other forms of dynamic content specifically for this reason (Bay Networks is one example).

On the "It's Important, Dude!" side:
Still, java remains a very hot 'buzzword', and middle-tier/low-end developers are using it more. <bleh> The PGRX thingie you showed me is a recent example: 3dshopping.com Sites like these are popping up everyday because the crazed net craze.

Also, Java's 'problems' may be going away if JVM standardization really happens. Recently, Netscape and Microsoft agreed to standardize on Apple's MRJ for Java going forward (for Mac browsers). Obviously, this doesn't solve everything, but it's a step. And when Java turns into the 'write-once, play everywhere' thing it was supposed to be, this will be a very serious issue for SRCM.

If their 'VM' thingie is real and has a good dev team, they already know this and will figure out a solution. If it isn't, and they aren't, look out below.

Since I still can't find any serious info on their 'VM' thingie, this is still a trading marble to shoot around the pinball machine; not a serious long investment, IMO.



To: Pluvia who wrote (1972)12/19/1998 5:27:00 PM
From: MW  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3015
 
<<Bill,
Sorry I didn't go back and try to explain your misunderstanding regarding the Java issue. Thanks Archer for trying to clear that up.

Essentially since SRCM's browser software does not "read" Java, any web site that uses Java, that a user of SRCM's browser tries to access would essentially not work as I understand it.

Could you please explain to us how important this might be? >>

OBJECTION!!!!! YOUR HONOUR LEADING THE WITNESS

MW